2009 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ests.2009.4906500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of real-time power-loss minimizers for induction motors

Abstract: This paper presents a survey of available techniques for minimizing power losses and input power of induction motors. The presented techniques serve different induction motor applications, including electric ship propulsion systems. Realtime techniques presented here are divided into three main categories: model-based methods that use the induction motor model, physics-based methods that search for the minimum power loss regardless of the motor model or parameters, and hybrid methods that combine both approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Known techniques including perturb and observe (P&O) algorithms [1], adaptive P&O (APO), and ripple correlation control (RCC) [2]. These are utilized in several applications including maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of photovoltaic (PV) systems, [3], loss minimization in machines [4], and impedance matching [5], among others. While conventional P&O drives to the optimum by perturbing the system and moving the control variable toward the optimum with fixed step size, APO employs adaptive step size to increase tracking speed and reduce steadystate oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known techniques including perturb and observe (P&O) algorithms [1], adaptive P&O (APO), and ripple correlation control (RCC) [2]. These are utilized in several applications including maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of photovoltaic (PV) systems, [3], loss minimization in machines [4], and impedance matching [5], among others. While conventional P&O drives to the optimum by perturbing the system and moving the control variable toward the optimum with fixed step size, APO employs adaptive step size to increase tracking speed and reduce steadystate oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, field-oriented control (FOC) strategy is still widely used, due to its excellent dynamic response obtained by maintaining a large excitation current. However, at the same time it also pays a price of high loss under non-rated working conditions [1,2]. For the balance of dynamic performance and efficiency, LMC strategy is usually switched after using FOC to reach a steady state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With phase increases, the inverter loss increase with number of switching devices, so both the inverter and motor losses should be considered in the LMC strategy for multi-phase motor drive systems. Many LMC strategies for rotating induction motors (RIM) have been proposed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Researches [3], [5], [6] each proposed a system-level RIM loss model and corresponding control strategy, adding inverter losses, DC bus losses and filter circuit losses to the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in part-load operation, the efficiency of the induction machine dramatically decreases when the flux is kept at the nominal level. To address this issue different strategies have been developed in the past to increase the efficiency of the induction machine in a large operation range [1]. The main idea of these methods is to choose an appropriate value for the rotor flux depending on the machine load in a stationary state of the machine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%