Computational Imaging and Vision
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6182-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on 3D Modeling of Human Faces for Face Recognition

Abstract: In its quest for more reliability and higher recognition rates the face recognition community has been focusing more and more on 3D based recognition. Depth information adds another dimension to facial features and provides ways to minimize the effects of pose and illumination variations for achieving greater recognition accuracy. This chapter reviews, therefore, the major techniques for 3D face modeling, the first step in any 3D assisted face recognition system. The reviewed techniques are laser range scans, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Günther et al [12] have found that these traditional face recognition algorithms are not designed to and, therefore, do not perform very well on images with uncontrolled factors such as facial expression, non-frontal illumination, partial occlusions of the face, or non-frontal face pose, which occur in modern face recognition datasets [15,18]. While different strategies have been proposed to improve the performance of traditional algorithms across pose, e.g., using face frontalization techniques [14] or 3D modeling [16], the introduction of deep convolutional neural networks (DC-NNs) for face recognition [36,24] has overcome the pose issue to a significant extent. For example, deep neural net-works have outperformed traditional methods by such a wide margin on the labeled faces in the wild (LFW) benchmark [15] that this once challenging benchmark is now considered quite easy, at least under the conventional verification protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Günther et al [12] have found that these traditional face recognition algorithms are not designed to and, therefore, do not perform very well on images with uncontrolled factors such as facial expression, non-frontal illumination, partial occlusions of the face, or non-frontal face pose, which occur in modern face recognition datasets [15,18]. While different strategies have been proposed to improve the performance of traditional algorithms across pose, e.g., using face frontalization techniques [14] or 3D modeling [16], the introduction of deep convolutional neural networks (DC-NNs) for face recognition [36,24] has overcome the pose issue to a significant extent. For example, deep neural net-works have outperformed traditional methods by such a wide margin on the labeled faces in the wild (LFW) benchmark [15] that this once challenging benchmark is now considered quite easy, at least under the conventional verification protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the algorithmic level, the techniques vary depending on the modes of model representation (or registration) [2], feature extraction [3] and matching [4]. A good set of survey papers [5] provide varied systems on generic 3DFR. These cover a range of techniques starting from imaging, representation, matching, both grey scale as well as colour images.…”
Section: Review Of Current Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive techniques, like stereo vision, shape-from-shading or shape-from-motion usually lack adequate accuracy for 3D face modelling [45]. Spatial resolution for these techniques are in the mm range.…”
Section: D Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With current available devices, active systems based on triangulation offer higher accuracy compared to systems based on time-of-flight [45]. Regardless of the data acquisition technique used, the scans have to be processed to remove scanning artefacts like holes and spikes.…”
Section: D Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%