2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synergism of in silico and statistical approaches to discover new potential endocrine disruptor mycotoxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in studies may be associated with the different S -epimers and receptors used. A binding energy value of − 7 represents a ligand having affinity for a receptor [41] , and higher the negative value the stronger the binding affinity [37] , which supports the results of the present study. In a different study utilizing ergocristinine, medium to high binding affinity to certain nuclear receptors was demonstrated [41] , suggesting ergocristinine has the potential to have high affinity to receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in studies may be associated with the different S -epimers and receptors used. A binding energy value of − 7 represents a ligand having affinity for a receptor [41] , and higher the negative value the stronger the binding affinity [37] , which supports the results of the present study. In a different study utilizing ergocristinine, medium to high binding affinity to certain nuclear receptors was demonstrated [41] , suggesting ergocristinine has the potential to have high affinity to receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The authors acknowledge there is a lack of S -epimer data concerning receptor binding. Another study screened multiple mycotoxins, including several R and S -epimers of ergot alkaloids, binding to nuclear receptors [41] . In each study, the S -epimer-receptor binding was not the primary focus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 ZEN was classified as a Group III carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 1993. 15,16 However, according to previous literature, chronic ingestion of ZEN can cause multiple chronic toxic effects, including reproductive toxicity, hepatotoxicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. For example, ZEN can cause reproductive disorders in rats and pigs, cause infertility in livestock and poultry, and cause morphological changes in the reproductive organs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%