2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31863-9_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Syntactic Approach for Detecting Viral Polymorphic Malware Variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our syntactic approach is independent of any prior semantic knowledge. The syntactic approach most closely related to ours [53] adds nothing new to what was reported by Chen et al's approach in 2012 [28], and repeats the structural sequence alignment and data mining approaches adopted in that paper and subsequently enhanced by [29] [30] [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, our syntactic approach is independent of any prior semantic knowledge. The syntactic approach most closely related to ours [53] adds nothing new to what was reported by Chen et al's approach in 2012 [28], and repeats the structural sequence alignment and data mining approaches adopted in that paper and subsequently enhanced by [29] [30] [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The most effective signatures were determined to be the signatures that detected over 90% of the variants. These signatures were placed inside our own generated (.ndb) database [29], which is used by Clamscan as a recommended database file format for signature testing purposes. Detection performance for each of the three viruses was measured using the following metrics: true positive rate (sensitivity), true negative rate (specificity), positive predictive value (precision), detection ratio reported by the "TopTenReviews" [71] website.…”
Section: Results and Evaluation Of State-of-the-art Avs Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations