2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2011.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Syntax-based approach to measuring the degree of inconsistency for belief bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with ID 4 and ID Q , the MUS based measure I MI = |MUSes(K)| can distinguish γ 1 and γ 2 . However, as argued in [26], I MI does not satisfy dominance property. In this paper, we further refine the notion of MUS and propose a new one called DMUS (for deduced MUS) which leads to an interesting inconsistency measure that satisfies a new restrictive but more intuitive dominance property, called weak dominance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with ID 4 and ID Q , the MUS based measure I MI = |MUSes(K)| can distinguish γ 1 and γ 2 . However, as argued in [26], I MI does not satisfy dominance property. In this paper, we further refine the notion of MUS and propose a new one called DMUS (for deduced MUS) which leads to an interesting inconsistency measure that satisfies a new restrictive but more intuitive dominance property, called weak dominance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In [26], the authors show that the measure I MI does not satisfy the dominance property. To support their claim, they provide the following counterexample:…”
Section: Mus-based Logical Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next we consider several properties that have been studied for inconsistency measures (see [11,12,23]) and show which of them hold for distance-based measures.…”
Section: Definition 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mu et al claim that dominance is not appropriate for characterizing variable-based measures for the degree of inconsistency (Mu et al, 2011). They argue that {x, ¬x} might be seen as more inconsistent than {x ∧ y, ¬x}, since the latter set contains a non-contradictory information that y holds.…”
Section: Definition 3 (Dominance) An Inconsistency Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convincing arguments can be constructed even to support the fact that inconsistency is not always a bad thing (Gabbay and Hunter, 1991;Gabbay and Hunter, 1993). The question how to measure inconsistency of a knowledge base has attracted attention of researchers in recent years (Knight, 2002;Hunter and Konieczny, 2005;Hunter and Konieczny, 2008;Hunter and Konieczny, 2010;Mu et al, 2011;Grant and Hunter, 2011b;Grant and Hunter, 2013). In some papers, the measure of inconsistency depends on the proportion of the language that is affected by the inconsistency in a theory (Konieczny et al, 2003;Grant and Hunter, 2006;Hunter and Konieczny, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%