2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2018.00043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Syntax-Guided Neural Model for Natural Language Interfaces to Databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their design, they introduce new models for translation, seamlessly merging deep learning with traditional techniques for database analysis and developing new techniques to allow the neural network to reject queries irrelevant to the content of the target database, and recommend that candidate queries be translated back into a tuned natural language. According to [21], the slow development of Natural Language Interfaces for Databases (NLIDB) stems from linguistic issues (such as language ambiguity) as well as domain portability. Brad et al [21]assert that there is a demand for non-expert users to make queries to relational databases using their natural language instead of utilizing specified attribute values for the database domain.…”
Section: Natural Language Processing (Nlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their design, they introduce new models for translation, seamlessly merging deep learning with traditional techniques for database analysis and developing new techniques to allow the neural network to reject queries irrelevant to the content of the target database, and recommend that candidate queries be translated back into a tuned natural language. According to [21], the slow development of Natural Language Interfaces for Databases (NLIDB) stems from linguistic issues (such as language ambiguity) as well as domain portability. Brad et al [21]assert that there is a demand for non-expert users to make queries to relational databases using their natural language instead of utilizing specified attribute values for the database domain.…”
Section: Natural Language Processing (Nlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [21], the slow development of Natural Language Interfaces for Databases (NLIDB) stems from linguistic issues (such as language ambiguity) as well as domain portability. Brad et al [21]assert that there is a demand for non-expert users to make queries to relational databases using their natural language instead of utilizing specified attribute values for the database domain. According to [22], the use of natural language instead of SQL-based queries enabled the development of NLIDB, a new type of processing that represents an approach to developing intelligent database systems aimed at improving the performance of flexible queries in databases.…”
Section: Natural Language Processing (Nlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambiguity. Another problem that blocks the research process is language ambiguity [ 31 ]. After a long-term NL evolution, people tend to express their thoughts relatively concisely, such as with fewer words and shorter phrases.…”
Section: Insights Gained From Nlscg Research Backlogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset is one of the essential factors determining the upper bound of the model performance to some extent. The abundance of high-quality labeled data is critical for effectively training supervised models [ 31 , 51 ]. However, manually annotating NL utterances with their corresponding SC is expensive, cumbersome, and time consuming [ 10 , 38 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Insights Gained From Nlscg Research Backlogmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation