2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41870-020-00599-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic analysis of difficulty level of the question paper using student’s marks: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when an instructor makes a new question, it is useful for them to have an idea of the question's DL. The common method to obtain a valid and reliable DL is by collecting sufficient student performance data and report an Item Difficulty Level [10], [11] and a Discrimination Index [10]. Automated methods such as the accumulative test by Sokolova et al [12], the Question Classifier Engine by Narayanan et al [13], or the algorithm based on a Monte-Carlo approach by Sud et al [14] require actual student performance as input data.…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when an instructor makes a new question, it is useful for them to have an idea of the question's DL. The common method to obtain a valid and reliable DL is by collecting sufficient student performance data and report an Item Difficulty Level [10], [11] and a Discrimination Index [10]. Automated methods such as the accumulative test by Sokolova et al [12], the Question Classifier Engine by Narayanan et al [13], or the algorithm based on a Monte-Carlo approach by Sud et al [14] require actual student performance as input data.…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%