2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.12772
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic approach to Lyapunov analyses of continuous-time models in convex optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance estimation problem (PEP). From the seminal work of Drori & Teboulle (2014), performance estimation problem (PEP) has been widely used to obtain the worst-case complexity of algorithms, including first-order methods (Kim & Fessler, 2017;Taylor et al, 2017;De Klerk et al, 2017;Kim & Fessler, 2018;Taylor et al, 2018b;Barré et al, 2020;De Klerk et al, 2020;Kim & Fessler, 2021;Abbaszadehpeivasti et al, 2022a;Barré et al, 2022b;Kamri et al, 2022;Rotaru et al, 2022;Gupta et al, 2023), operator splitting methods (Ryu et al, 2020), minimax algorithms (Abbaszadehpeivasti et al, 2021Gorbunov et al, 2022;Zamani et al, 2022), proximal point methods (Gu & Yang, 2020;Kim, 2021;Gu & Yang, 2022;, decentralized methods (Colla & Hendrickx, 2021;, coordinate descent methods (Abbaszadehpeivasti et al, 2022b), and even the continuous-time models (Moucer et al, 2022). PEP also finds the optimal method with optimal worst-case complexity (Drori & Teboulle, 2016;Kim & Fessler, 2016;Drori & Taylor, 2020;Taylor & Drori, 2022;Kim, 2021;Park & Ryu, 2022), and is even used to construct the Lyapunov function for the proof of convergence (Taylor et al, 2018a) and complexity lower bound (Dragomir et al, 2022).…”
Section: Inconsistentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance estimation problem (PEP). From the seminal work of Drori & Teboulle (2014), performance estimation problem (PEP) has been widely used to obtain the worst-case complexity of algorithms, including first-order methods (Kim & Fessler, 2017;Taylor et al, 2017;De Klerk et al, 2017;Kim & Fessler, 2018;Taylor et al, 2018b;Barré et al, 2020;De Klerk et al, 2020;Kim & Fessler, 2021;Abbaszadehpeivasti et al, 2022a;Barré et al, 2022b;Kamri et al, 2022;Rotaru et al, 2022;Gupta et al, 2023), operator splitting methods (Ryu et al, 2020), minimax algorithms (Abbaszadehpeivasti et al, 2021Gorbunov et al, 2022;Zamani et al, 2022), proximal point methods (Gu & Yang, 2020;Kim, 2021;Gu & Yang, 2022;, decentralized methods (Colla & Hendrickx, 2021;, coordinate descent methods (Abbaszadehpeivasti et al, 2022b), and even the continuous-time models (Moucer et al, 2022). PEP also finds the optimal method with optimal worst-case complexity (Drori & Teboulle, 2016;Kim & Fessler, 2016;Drori & Taylor, 2020;Taylor & Drori, 2022;Kim, 2021;Park & Ryu, 2022), and is even used to construct the Lyapunov function for the proof of convergence (Taylor et al, 2018a) and complexity lower bound (Dragomir et al, 2022).…”
Section: Inconsistentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is then reformulated in a sequence of steps to arrive at a semidefinite program. The PEP methodology, first presented in [12], has been extended in a sequence of works that guarantee tightness in each step of the reformulation [28,27], has been adapted as a tool for Lyapunov analysis [26,29,21], and extended to monotone inclusion problems [25]. The IQC methodology is based on integral quadratic constraints from the control literature [19] and uses a simple algorithm representation but lacks tightness guarantees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%