A Systematic Examination of Actor and Trainee Interviewer Behaviour during Joint Investigative Interviewing Training

Abstract

This study is the first systematic examination of trainee interviewer and actor behaviour during Joint Investigative Interviewing Training (JIIT) simulations across two training sites in Scotland. As expected, interviewers were poor at adhering to best practice interview guidelines in the pre-substantive and closure phases of the interviews. Although invitations were used within the range of best practice, they were not used more often and did not elicit more allegation-related details than directive questions. Critically, actors’ responses to invitations were less informative than their responses to all other question types. Furthermore, large differences were observed between the two training sites in the number of questions asked and amount of information elicited by interviewers. Our results show that (1) trainee interviewers are not utilising simulations to practice all required interviewing skills, (2) adult actors are not reinforcing interviewers’ use of invitations as intended, and (3) trainee interviewers are not being afforded the same opportunities to practice their skills due to variation in resources across Scotland. We recommend improvements to the JIIT programme to address these concerns.

From criminal interrogations to investigative interviews: a bibliometric study

“…Moreover, scientific data on criminal interrogations and investigative interviews goes far beyond theoretical issues. The implementation of evidence-based practices, for example, has been subject to extensive research (e.g., Milne et al, 2019 ; Risan et al, 2020 ; Brimbal et al, 2021 ; Brubacher et al, 2021 ; Nicol et al, 2023 ). However, despite the numerous publications, little is known about the structure of the research field of criminal interrogations and investigative interviews.…”