A Systematic Literature Review: Human Roles, Competencies And Skills In Industry 4.0

Janis, Ilyana

doi:10.15405/epsbs.2018.05.84

Cited by 15 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, it was necessary for the author to understand the Industry 4.0 scenario in the manufacturing sector first. This was supported by a systematic literature review (previously conducted by the authors) on the human role, competencies, and skills required in Industry 4.0 (Janis & Alias, 2018). Most studies on competency, which used quantitative approaches following the positivist research paradigm, were related to evaluation inquiry and the prediction of new competencies.…”

mentioning

confidence: 80%

Using Illustrations to Make Decisions on the Most Appropriate Qualitative Research Methodology: The Industry 4.0 Scenario

Janis

Alias

Zulkipli

et al. 2020

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industry 4.0 is viewed as a complex scenario. This complex scenario could be interpreted using illustrations such as sketches or drawings. Ideally, sketches and drawings are useful in illustrating complexity and multiple abstracts from observed social reality. The use of illustrations allows novice qualitative researchers to explore observed social reality in depth with less linear insight. However, few scholars mention the use of illustrations at the research planning stage because most sketches and drawings have been used as tools during data collection merely to understand an interviewee’s perspective. Therefore, this article aims to demonstrate the use of illustrations as a tool to facilitate the research process from problem identification to the selection of the qualitative research methodology. Five specific purposes of illustration that significantly contribute to the body of knowledge for effective decision making and are useful tools in delivering information are demonstrated in this article. Based on the illustrations demonstrated in this article, the most appropriate qualitative research methodology is the case study. Overall, the proposed use of illustrations can assist a novice qualitative researcher in determining the appropriate epistemological and ontological stances, as well as their methodology and method, more effectively.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 80%

Using Illustrations to Make Decisions on the Most Appropriate Qualitative Research Methodology: The Industry 4.0 Scenario

Janis

Alias

Zulkipli

et al. 2020

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Five citations are from 2018 (Janis and Alias 2018;Marszalek and Volz 2018;Mizuchi and Inamura 2018;Ottogalli et al 2018;Shu et al 2018), eight citations are from 2019 (Chang et al 2019;Gao et al 2019bGao et al , 2019aMoon et al 2019;Ojstersek et al 2019;Randon and Cecconello 2019;Shu and Sziebig 2019;Yan et al 2019) and five citations are from 2020 (Anik et al 2020;Malik et al 2020;Metzner, Utsch, et al 2020;Peruzzini et al 2020).…”

Section: Researchgatementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, there is one paper that has been uploaded twice using the format "code" and the number of real citations is 18. Of these, four are journal articles (Anik et al 2020;Malik et al 2020;Peruzzini et al 2020;Randon and Cecconello 2019), twelve are conference papers (H.-P. Chang et al 2019;Gao et al 2019b;Janis and Alias 2018;Metzner, Krieg, et al 2020;Mizuchi and Inamura 2018;Moon et al 2019;Ojstersek et al 2019;Ottogalli et al 2018;Shu et al 2018;Shu and Sziebig 2019;Yan et al 2019) and two are preprints (Gao et al 2019a;Marszalek and Volz 2018). One of the journal articles is in Portuguese (Randon and Cecconello 2019).…”

Section: Researchgatementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Semantic Scholar lists 19 citations for the paper. Four are journal articles (Anik et al 2020;Malik et al 2020;Oliveira Valério et al 2020;Peruzzini et al 2020), thirteen are conference papers (H.-P. Chang et al 2019;Gao et al 2019b;Janis and Alias 2018;Metzner, Krieg, et al 2020;Metzner, Utsch, et al 2020;Mizuchi and Inamura 2018;Moon et al 2019;Ojstersek et al 2019;Ottogalli et al 2018;Shu et al 2018;Shu and Sziebig 2019;Yan et al 2019) and one is a preprint (Gao et al 2019a). One citation is wrongly directed to the whole conference proceedings containing the conference paper "Intuitive, VR-and Gesturebased Physical Interaction with Virtual Commissioning Simulation Models" (Metzner, Krieg, et al 2020).…”

Section: Semantic Scholarmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Citation review of Human-Machine Collaboration in Virtual Reality for Adaptive Production Engineering by de Giorgio et al.

Giorgio¹,

Onori²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that despite a citation review is a rarely used research tool, this can be very useful to assess the impact of new research topics, both from the future research direction and the bibliometric perspectives. An explorative study is presented around the research area marked as Industry 4.0 with the conference paper mentioned in the title of this citation review. Even though the given reference paper is relatively recent, there are already twenty-seven citations listed among three different scholar databases. These are Google Scholar, ResearchGate and Semantic Scholar. In light of this, the article provides a bibliometric confirmation and analysis for the progression of the line of research adopted by de Giorgio et al. in the exploration of non-traditional methods using virtual reality technology and human-robot collaboration for adaptive applications in Industry 4.0. Furthermore, it represents a model for the authors’ self-development and an example of an unconventional approach to scientific work that may help improve related bibliometric research and scholar database strategies to index new articles and topics in the future.

show abstract

“…In coping with Industry 4.0, the curriculum of Vocational High School has to be revised to adjust with the students' skills and the business and industries world. Janis andAlias (2017, p. 1052) also state that Vocational Education and Training (TVET) educators improvise the TVET curriculum structure with the aim of producing the technical graduates that are capable of working in the Industry 4.0 work environment. The curriculum in the vocational field should concern the needs of Industry 4.0.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the implementation of workshop and laboratory management on vocational high school

Pangestu

Sukardi

2019

jpv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to reveal: the development of workshop and laboratory management implementation, also the suitability of facilities and infrastructure on Vocational High School in Banggai District, which refers to the indicator of good workshop and laboratory, according to the Directorate of Vocational Education. This research is evaluation research, which employs a goal free evaluation model and descriptive quantitative approach. The research sample involved in this study was 187 teachers and students. The data analysis technique used in this research was the average score and skewness. The result of this research shows that: (1) The workshop development is appropriate enough and good, yet it still needs further improvement with students to score at 81.19 and -0.229 also the teachers at 197.78 and -0.433. (2) The laboratory development is appropriate enough, and it still needs further improvement with students to score at 96.64 and 0.393, also the teachers at 209.03 and 0.36. (3) The suitability of the workshop’s facilities and infrastructure is appropriate enough, and it still needs further improvement with the score at 250.205 and 0.549, and also the laboratory is appropriate enough and good, yet it still needs further improvement with the score at 252.80 and -1.694.

show abstract

A Systematic Literature Review: Human Roles, Competencies And Skills In Industry 4.0

Abstract: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Cited by 15 publications

References 45 publications

Using Illustrations to Make Decisions on the Most Appropriate Qualitative Research Methodology: The Industry 4.0 Scenario

Using Illustrations to Make Decisions on the Most Appropriate Qualitative Research Methodology: The Industry 4.0 Scenario

Citation review of Human-Machine Collaboration in Virtual Reality for Adaptive Production Engineering by de Giorgio et al.

Evaluation of the implementation of workshop and laboratory management on vocational high school

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About