2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review of “rape victims” versus “rape survivors”: Implications for theory, research, and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(171 reference statements)
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Academic, activist, clinician, and media discourses surrounding sexual violence encourage “survivorhood” and discourage “victimhood” (e.g., Dunn ; Hockett and Saucier ). Yet we know little about how these identities are incorporated into the self‐concept and predict actual distress.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Academic, activist, clinician, and media discourses surrounding sexual violence encourage “survivorhood” and discourage “victimhood” (e.g., Dunn ; Hockett and Saucier ). Yet we know little about how these identities are incorporated into the self‐concept and predict actual distress.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that more positive and powerful attributes are associated with “survivors” than “victims” in both academic researchers’ language and students’ cultural scripts (Hockett and Saucier ; Papendick and Bohner ), Raisman’s resistance to identifying as a “victim” is understandable. It reflects a tension between the “victim” and “survivor” identities in cultural discourse and a preference for “survivorship” among feminists, activists, clinicians, academics, and the media (Dunn ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants spoke about the victim/survivor dialectic and mirrored the common practice in RCC counseling to use the word “survivor” over “victim” as it is considered the more respectful and empowering label. Although much has been written on these terms from an empowerment perspective (Hockett & Saucier, ; Ovenden, ; Young & Maguire, ), there has been less focus on how this dichotomy upholds a neoliberal ideology. Participants often spoke about how to help survivors “feel” more in control or have a “sense” of agency; using the language of “survivor” was one example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al's (2018) position could be viewed as being rather radical in the general rejection of what they see as identity labels. Other researchers (for an overview, see Hockett & Saucier, 2015) do not problematise identity labels as such but do favour one over the other: most often the 'survivor' label or the combined 'survivor/victim' construction over the 'victim' label. These researchers' argument is that the 'victim' label, as an identity label, signifies something weak, fundamentally broken and powerless.…”
Section: A Note On the 'Victim' Labelmentioning
confidence: 99%