2021
DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review of participatory design studies involving teachers

Abstract: Participatory design is a well-known approach that involves stakeholders in designing technologies and other innovations. In education, participatory design is especially advocated for involving students with special needs. However, less attention has been paid to how participatory design can help in collaborations with teachers. This paper presents a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(191 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pascual Medina and Navío-Gàmez (2018) point out constant update and improvement, in addition to observation and empathy skills, as personal characteristics that an innovative teacher must have. The organization by disciplines and closed evaluation methods often hinder educational innovation processes because they generate closed structures where flexibility and creativity are difficult, as they are seen by teaching staff as initiatives imposed from above or simply as educational games (Tuhkala, 2021). There is also a lack of funding and resources that hinders the development of initiatives, in addition to the constant administrative procedures associated with these processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pascual Medina and Navío-Gàmez (2018) point out constant update and improvement, in addition to observation and empathy skills, as personal characteristics that an innovative teacher must have. The organization by disciplines and closed evaluation methods often hinder educational innovation processes because they generate closed structures where flexibility and creativity are difficult, as they are seen by teaching staff as initiatives imposed from above or simply as educational games (Tuhkala, 2021). There is also a lack of funding and resources that hinders the development of initiatives, in addition to the constant administrative procedures associated with these processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review of participatory design studies (Tuhkala 2021) found that teachers are not often involved in co-designing technologies that they use in their teaching. Co-design can be very intensive, involving a small group of teachers.…”
Section: Methods What Co-design Is and Why We Used Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hundal, Levin, and Keselman (2014) worked with four teachers on a weekly basis for 10 months. The majority of the 72 studies reviewed by (Tuhkala 2021) were with small numbers of teachers. A smaller number of lengthier (e.g., a half or full day) workshops is also an option (see for example Paracha et al 2019).…”
Section: Methods What Co-design Is and Why We Used Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many times partnerships do not become fully beneficial for communities, as they fail to substantially transform their conditions during and after the partnerships (Baum, 2000). Recent literature shows how universities are facing this issue and establishing a commitment to a mutually beneficial exchange with communities (Tuhkala, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%