2022
DOI: 10.1080/0158037x.2022.2135499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review on technology in online doctoral education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also agree with the views of Rockinson-Szapkiw et al ( 2014) that such communitybuilding initiatives being led by students can prove highly effective. Notwithstanding this, effective learning design on the part of staff through their use of the institutional virtual learning environment as well as synchronous communication tools such as Zoom and the facilities available within these emerged as an essential factor (Cullinane et al, 2022;Lee et al, 2022;Lively et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also agree with the views of Rockinson-Szapkiw et al ( 2014) that such communitybuilding initiatives being led by students can prove highly effective. Notwithstanding this, effective learning design on the part of staff through their use of the institutional virtual learning environment as well as synchronous communication tools such as Zoom and the facilities available within these emerged as an essential factor (Cullinane et al, 2022;Lee et al, 2022;Lively et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not a path we ourselves had walked before, the use of online means for the facilitation of doctoral programmes is now well established (Lee et al, 2022;Melián et al, 2023). Students of fully online or blended programmes are no less susceptible to a number of the challenges outlined earlier in this paper for those engaging in face-to-face programmes, such as the dangers of isolation, stress, and negative impact on wellbeing in their pursuit of a doctorate, and are likewise in need of support systems in helping them overcome such challenges (Berry, 2019;Deshpande, 2016;Hazell et al, 2020).…”
Section: Study Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elearning is a modern form of learning that already embodies all the characteristics of traditional education. Current research is discussing the shift in paradigm from conventional education to this new model (Lee et al 2022). Worldwide, distance learning has consistently expanded with the assistance of technology, influencing the overall quality of education.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online learning has been increasingly recognised as a convenient way for candidates to study for the past few decades (Burke et al, 2022), along with a sharp increase in online offerings during COVID-19 to enable continuation of study with the absence of face-to-face interactions throughout the pandemic (Sim et al, 2021). Similarly, there has been an increasing number of doctoral candidates enrolled online (Mirick & Wladkowski, 2020) to meet the needs of students from diverse geographical locations (Lee et al, 2022) and mid-career adult learners (Williams et al, 2019) who have established work and social responsibilities that benefit from studying online at their own pace.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online doctoral candidates were found by Williams et al (2019) to be time pressured, with many working long hours, trying to balance work, life and study (Sharabani et al, 2023). Lee et al (2022) suggested that online doctoral candidates were also overwhelmed by the number of resources online and the complexity of technology. Difficulty in negotiating access to resources within learning was supported by Al-Adwan et al (2022), who found that learning content and design were fundamental for academic success and students who experienced success in online learning were self-directed in accessing resources.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%