A systematic literature review on circular economy practices: challenges, opportunities and future trends

Abstract

Purpose The circular economy (CE) is an evolving subject transitioning from conceptualization to empirical testing. Over the past decade, researchers have done an exhaustive study to understand the concept of CE and its realized values both financially and environmentally on organizations that have traditional business models based on linear consumption. For understanding the transitional phenomena completely, the paper aims to review the current and emerging research trends in CE to ascertain future direction. Design/methodology/approach The research was conducted on 91 articles published in the study area during the past decade (2016–2021) in renowned peer-reviewed journals. The criteria set to review literature are based on the following assortment: CE drivers, CE barriers, definitions by different authors, yearly distribution of the publication, research publisher and journals, google citation and methodology used in the selected research articles. Findings The study suggests that researchers from the selected years are keen to understand the transition and its critical factors by bringing forward frameworks and incorporating CE with digital technologies. The digital technology implied are Industrial Technology (IR) 4.0, Big Data, Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Data Analytics to increase organizational and environmental performance. CE researchers need to use empirical testing in different sectors to understand and bring forward more improvised business models and practices according to the dynamics of the industry. Originality/value The literature review suggests gaps exist to integrate the micro, meso and macro levels to get CE implementation's system-wide benefits. The study has also identified that many CE frameworks available in the literature for implementation must be empirically tested to yield performance results.

New momentum for data, government investment in technology, and high-quality urban development in the yellow river basin

“…From the perspective of the direct spatial effects, new momentum for data, government investment in technology, human capital, government intervention, S&T innovation, and openness significantly improve the HQD of a city; from the perspective of the indirect effects, new momentum for data, government investment in technology, S&T innovation, openness, and economic development level have significant positive spillover effects on the HQD of neighboring cities, while human capital and government intervention stifle the HQD of neighboring cities. This result is consistent with related studies which indicate that in the process of promoting high-quality urban development, it is important to pay attention not only to the local effects of these influences on cities but also to their spillover effects on neighboring cities (Zheng and Du, 2020;Yuan et al, 2021;Khan et al, 2022a;Khan and Cui, 2022;Mohsin et al, 2022;Sun et al, 2022).…”

“…By reducing market failures arising from information asymmetry, the new momentum for data can improve the overall operational efficiency of the market, reduce financing costs in the financial market, and promote high-quality urban development (Cai and Ma, 2021). For green development, data is a non-polluting and renewable means of production, and innovation in the use of data resources can effectively eliminate excessive consumption of tangible resources, reduce environmental pollution and ecological damage, help create a green, low-carbon, and sustainable model for economic and social development, and thus promote high-quality urban development (Khan et al, 2022a;Khan et al, 2022c). For openness development, the new momentum for data serves as an essential part in promoting openness and sharing of data in governments, as well as standardizing social data collection.…”

The Geopolitical Risk and Strategic Uncertainty of Green Growth after the Ukraine Invasion: How the Circular Economy Can Decrease the Market Power of and Resource Dependency on Critical Minerals

“…This research adds perspectives to the presented review [84] of newer (post-2017) published articles on critical minerals in the EV industry (Table 1). Propositions based on transaction cost theory have been associated with the outcome variables in this review.…”

Harmonizing multi-dimensional events that characterize tech start-up emergence in emerging economies: a systematic review

“…We approach our study by deploying a concept-centric systematic literature review as recommended by some scholars (Levy and Ellis, 2006; Webster and Watson, 2002; Rowe, 2014; Paré et al , 2017; Okoli, 2015; Schryen, 2013). A systematic literature review provides detailed steps, identifying, analysing, evaluating and interpreting prior relevant studies in a given area of interest (Castro and Zermeño, 2020; Chan and Mustafa, 2020; Ahmad and Bajwa, 2021; Aldairany et al , 2018; Aljuwaiber, 2020; Hänle et al , 2021; Khan et al , 2022; Sharma, 2018; Santisteban and Mauricio, 2017; Claire et al , 2019; Yamamura and Lassalle, 2022; Bansal et al , 2020). Consequently, it provides a rigorous process, free of biases and the credible outcome needed by researchers as a foundation for advancing knowledge (Webster and Watson, 2002; Okoli, 2015; Mahdavi, 2011).…”