2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2486745
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Facet Joint Orientation and Its Effect on the Lumbar

Abstract: Facet tropism is recognized as the difference in the positioning of the facet joints in association with each other in the sagittal plane. This guides to an imbalanced biomechanical force over the facet joints and the intervertebral disc during rotation and other physiological activities. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and CINHAL from 2004 to 2021 to recognize the related research studies was performed. The data for meta-analysis were obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We postulate that the discovery of biomarkers may help us identify the risk factors for certain LSD, such as DD, 4 degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, 6 etc. Our method can scale the research on FT as it is found to be associated with many LSD 38 and surgical risk factors. 39 Another observation was that the measurement of facet angles can be sensitive to the ground truth labels used for training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We postulate that the discovery of biomarkers may help us identify the risk factors for certain LSD, such as DD, 4 degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, 6 etc. Our method can scale the research on FT as it is found to be associated with many LSD 38 and surgical risk factors. 39 Another observation was that the measurement of facet angles can be sensitive to the ground truth labels used for training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi, as publisher, following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%