2018
DOI: 10.1055/a-0637-8806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy for retained biliary tract stones: laser, electrohydraulic or extracorporeal shock wave

Abstract: This systematic review revealed that laser lithotripsy appeared to be the most successful advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy technique for retained biliary tract stones, although randomized studies are lacking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
2
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
29
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this retrospective study, 42 patients with difficult biliary stones underwent LCBDE with FREDDY laser lithotripsy; all patients completed bile duct stone clearance, no bile duct mucosa bleeding and perforation cases were observed during the operation, and no post‐operative death occurred. Compared with the results of previous meta‐analyses, the ductal clearance rate of LCBDE with FREDDY laser lithotripsy (100%) in our study is higher than in those treated with EHL (88.4%) and ESWL (84.5%). However, the complication rate for the cases treated with LCBDE with FREDDY laser lithotripsy was lower than for the cases with EHL (13.8%) and ESWL (8.4%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this retrospective study, 42 patients with difficult biliary stones underwent LCBDE with FREDDY laser lithotripsy; all patients completed bile duct stone clearance, no bile duct mucosa bleeding and perforation cases were observed during the operation, and no post‐operative death occurred. Compared with the results of previous meta‐analyses, the ductal clearance rate of LCBDE with FREDDY laser lithotripsy (100%) in our study is higher than in those treated with EHL (88.4%) and ESWL (84.5%). However, the complication rate for the cases treated with LCBDE with FREDDY laser lithotripsy was lower than for the cases with EHL (13.8%) and ESWL (8.4%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…In a recent meta‐analysis retrospective study on the clinical role of EHL, laser lithotripsy and ESWL in patients with retained biliary tract stones, the results showed that laser lithotripsy appeared to be the most successful advanced endoscopy‐assisted lithotripsy technique for retained biliary tract stones. Moreover, a significantly lower post‐procedural complication rate was found for laser lithotripsy and ESWL when compared with EHL …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…EHL is commonly used in clinic, and its generated high-amplitude frequency hydraulic pressure waves could produce high energy that is absorbed by stones aiding in the disintegration of calculus 16,17 . In management of refractory biliary calculi, conventional EHL has difficulties in dealing with them efficiently, due to their peculiar consistency, size, location, and so on 18 . The low efficiency of EHL, on the one hand, leads to increased POC duration, and extra POC interventions; on the other hand, results in prolonged T-tube retaining time, and accessorial treatment costs 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some intractable calculi are unable to be fragmented despite long‐term exposure to repeated EHL with high voltage . Furthermore, the diffused energy may cause persistent damage to the wall of the bile duct, which results in serious complications . Herein, we introduce a new clamping‐assisted EHL (CEHL) method to achieve efficient fragmentation of intractable calculi (Video S1).…”
Section: Brief Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%