2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of domain analysis tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
54
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually a researcher has three options about the selection of the data collection tool: tool can be developed, tool can be adapted or tool can be adopted (Lisboa et al, 2010). The researchers did not go for the first two options because of monetary, logistic and time constraints.…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually a researcher has three options about the selection of the data collection tool: tool can be developed, tool can be adapted or tool can be adopted (Lisboa et al, 2010). The researchers did not go for the first two options because of monetary, logistic and time constraints.…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invar deliberately hides the internal technical aspects of using different variability models for configuration from the stakeholders performing the configuration. The specific tools or data formats (see [3,4,5]) used for defining the variability models are not relevant for the end users who primarily focus on the available configuration choices and their implications. Invar unifies configuration operations on variability models and allows modelers to freely choose a data representation by accessing variability models through web services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of developing a DSML, either from scratch or by reusing existing DSMLs, involves an initial phase of domain analysis (Lisboa et al, 2010;Czarnecki and Eisenecker, 2000). A domain analysis aims at documenting the domain knowledge in terms of the domain vocabulary and the domain requirements (e.g., rules of applying the domain terms, normative procedural guidelines).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%