A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness outcomes.DesignSystematic review.SettingA wide range of settings within primary and secondary care including hospitals and primary care centres.ParticipantsA wide range of demographic groups and age groups.Primary and secondary outcome measuresA broad range of patient safety and clinical effectiveness outcomes including mortality, physical symptoms, length of stay and adherence to treatment.ResultsThis study, summarising evidence from 55 studies, indicates consistent positive associations between patient experience, patient safety and clinical effectiveness for a wide range of disease areas, settings, outcome measures and study designs. It demonstrates positive associations between patient experience and self-rated and objectively measured health outcomes; adherence to recommended clinical practice and medication; preventive care (such as health-promoting behaviour, use of screening services and immunisation); and resource use (such as hospitalisation, length of stay and primary-care visits). There is some evidence of positive associations between patient experience and measures of the technical quality of care and adverse events. Overall, it was more common to find positive associations between patient experience and patient safety and clinical effectiveness than no associations.ConclusionsThe data presented display that patient experience is positively associated with clinical effectiveness and patient safety, and support the case for the inclusion of patient experience as one of the central pillars of quality in healthcare. It supports the argument that the three dimensions of quality should be looked at as a group and not in isolation. Clinicians should resist sidelining patient experience as too subjective or mood-oriented, divorced from the ‘real’ clinical work of measuring safety and effectiveness.

Satisfaction with childbirth services provided in public health facilities: results from a cross- sectional survey among postnatal women in Chhattisgarh, India

“…The ‘ceiling effect’ – participants’ tendencies to rate services more positively in general – is another known confounder, making it difficult to differentiate excellent care from adequate care [23,31]. Participants’ subjectivity – being pleased with services that are not necessarily evidence-based [32–34] – poses another confounder for quantitative studies measuring satisfaction. While qualitative studies have emerged as an alternative to study satisfaction, they involve a small group of participants who have been purposefully selected, and findings from such studies rarely can be generalised for programmatic changes, especially so in big countries, like India.…”

The storied mind: A meta-narrative review exploring the capacity of stories to foster humanism in health care

“…In recent decades, there has been a humanistic shift in healthcare toward understanding how patients experience their care as a means of better supporting their healing. [1][2][3][4] Patient experience data, both quantitative and qualitative, are collected in many ways including a range of data from patient satisfaction and experience which includes stories, anecdotes or narratives spanning the duration of patient care. At the point of care, healthcare providers consistently hear patient's stories and experiences allowing them to informally learn about how patients are experiencing their care.…”

Comorbid Chronic Pain and Depression: Patient Perspectives on Empathy

“…In a recent systematic review, Doyle, Lennox, and Bell (2013) found that effective patient-provider communication related to patient experience was shown to positively affect self-rated and objectively measured health outcomes as well as indicate higher levels of adherence to treatment. Research regarding pain management and patient-provider communication reveals seemingly contradictory patient and provider expectations and experiences: a contradiction that confounds the potential for improved pain management outcomes.…”