2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
182
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
12
182
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The FraIM is an appropriate methodology for this research because it is flexible and responsive, which was particularly relevant to the iterative process of inductive and deductive analyses engaged in to answer the first two research questions. Although eye-tracking hardware and software has been used to guide inferences about cognitive processing in a number of international studies 29 , it has never been used to aid the description of English second language learners' engagement with electronic quizzes and derivation of an EST reading comprehension. Therefore a pioneering approach was required, for which the FraIM's pragmatic guidelines are well suited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 The FraIM is an appropriate methodology for this research because it is flexible and responsive, which was particularly relevant to the iterative process of inductive and deductive analyses engaged in to answer the first two research questions. Although eye-tracking hardware and software has been used to guide inferences about cognitive processing in a number of international studies 29 , it has never been used to aid the description of English second language learners' engagement with electronic quizzes and derivation of an EST reading comprehension. Therefore a pioneering approach was required, for which the FraIM's pragmatic guidelines are well suited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye-tracking equipment has the potential to aid a researcher in making judgements about the difference between activity with or without intentionality. 29 Although this method has even successfully been done using complex models which infer cognitive processing 30 , in this research simple observation of gaze direction was considered sufficient because it revealed a prevalence of blatant attempts to game the system, as is discussed below.…”
Section: Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, most eye‐tracking research on multimedia learning has focused on measures that reflect intentional direction of visual attention and assumes that these measures reflect conceptual processes. The most prominent measures include fixation duration and switching between stimuli (for recent meta‐reviews, see Alemdag & Cagiltay, ; Gegenfurtner, Lehtinen, & Säljö, ; Lai et al., ). For example, long fixations on a stimulus are assumed to reflect deep processing of the information (Lai et al., ; Mason, Pluchino, & Tornatora, ; Schmidt‐Weigand, Kohnert, & Glowalla, ).…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, long fixations on a stimulus are assumed to reflect deep processing of the information (Lai et al., ; Mason, Pluchino, & Tornatora, ; Schmidt‐Weigand, Kohnert, & Glowalla, ). Furthermore, frequent switching between stimuli is assumed to reflect integration of information across the stimuli (Alemdag & Cagiltay, ; Johnson & Mayer, ; Stalbovs, Scheiter, & Gerjets, ). Indeed, these measures correlate with students’ conceptual competencies (Rau et al., 2015b; Van Gog & Scheiter, ).…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation