A systematic review of inequalities in the uptake of, adherence to, and effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions in adults

Abstract

The extent to which behavioral weight management interventions affect health inequalities is uncertain, as is whether trials of these interventions directly consider inequalities. We conducted a systematic review, synthesizing evidence on how different aspects of inequality impact uptake, adherence, and effectiveness in trials of behavioral weight management interventions. We included (cluster-) randomized controlled trials of primary care-applicable behavioral weight management interventions in adults with overweight or obesity published prior to March 2020. Data about trial uptake, intervention adherence, attrition, and weight change by PROGRESS-Plus criteria (place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender, religion, education, socioeconomic status, social capital, plus other discriminating factors) were extracted. Data were synthesized narratively and summarized in harvest plots. We identified 91 behavioral weight loss interventions and 12 behavioral weight loss maintenance interventions. Fifty-six of the 103 trials considered inequalities in relation to at least one of intervention or trial uptake (n = 15), intervention adherence (n = 15), trial attrition (n = 32), or weight outcome (n = 34). Most trials found no inequalities gradient. If a gradient was observed for trial uptake, intervention adherence, and trial attrition, those considered "more advantaged" did best. Alternative methods of data synthesis that enable data to be pooled and increase statistical power may enhance understanding of inequalities in behavioral weight management interventions.

Football fans' emotional attachment to their clubs as a predictor of weight loss in a prevention programme for men with obesity

“…As of now, men in Germany are not equally participating in public health offers and commercial programmes addressing WL. Thus, researchers and practitioners need to engage with suggestions to address more men, 39 attract more men, design and document programmes in regard to relative equity between genders 40 and have these programmes to promote effective WL. This study complements the research about men‐only interventions by adding info about possible predictors of WL in participants.…”

Preventing chronic disease in overweight and obese patients with low health literacy using eHealth and teamwork in primary healthcare (HeLP-GP): a cluster randomised controlled trial

“…Previous research has identified that socioeconomic factors have impacts on intervention/ trial uptake, intervention adherence and trial attrition. 63 Future research could consider using codesign principles to help better engage specific population groups, as well as GPs and PNs working with these groups, in the research design and development of the intervention. 64 CONCLUSION This trial of a multifaceted intervention designed to support better preventive care for overweight and obese patients from low socioeconomic areas in the real-world environment of Australian general practice showed some short-term improvement in health literacy and diet but did not show any change in weight or other physiological variables.…”

Is the uptake, engagement, and effectiveness of exclusively mobile interventions for the promotion of weight‐related behaviors equal for all? A systematic review

“…Yet, other aspects needed to achieve long‐term health behavior change, such as uptake, followed by engagement, are reported less often in studies on mHealth interventions for physical activity 26 and other weight‐related behaviors. Whereas uptake is reported by the majority of studies, the information usually relates to sample size, and not to the representativeness of the sample, that is, the number of people who accepted the invitation to take part compared to all contacted persons 27 …”