2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48517-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of studies utilizing hair glucocorticoids as a measure of stress suggests the marker is more appropriate for quantifying short-term stressors

Abstract: Quantitating glucocorticoids (GCs) in hairs is a popular method for assessing chronic stress in studies of humans and animals alike. The cause-and-effect relationship between stress and elevated GC levels in hairs, sampled weeks later, is however hard to prove. This systematic review evaluated the evidence supporting hair glucocorticoids (hGCs) as a biomarker of stress. Only a relatively small number of controlled studies employing hGC analyses have been published, and the quality of the evidence is compromise… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is mounting evidence that the cortisol content of hair reflects the corresponding systemic plasma levels of this hormone over time and so these can be used to estimate both psychological and physiological chronic stress and the extent of hypothalamic pituitary-adrenal axis disorders such as Cushing syndrome and Addison disease 23,27,43,[45][46][47] . However, the validity of the methods used to measure cortisol responses has been questioned 48 , and factors including age, sex, hair-washing frequency, hair treatments, or the use of oral contraceptives can produce misleading results 49 . The efficacy of MBI to affect cortisol responses reported by others was also lower than expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mounting evidence that the cortisol content of hair reflects the corresponding systemic plasma levels of this hormone over time and so these can be used to estimate both psychological and physiological chronic stress and the extent of hypothalamic pituitary-adrenal axis disorders such as Cushing syndrome and Addison disease 23,27,43,[45][46][47] . However, the validity of the methods used to measure cortisol responses has been questioned 48 , and factors including age, sex, hair-washing frequency, hair treatments, or the use of oral contraceptives can produce misleading results 49 . The efficacy of MBI to affect cortisol responses reported by others was also lower than expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, interpretation of many of these indices is not straightforward. For example, while faecal [108][109][110] and hair [111,112] cortisol concentrations have been employed as a physiological index of stress [108][109][110][111][112], the significance of non-specific stress for an animal's mental experience is unclear [52,113]. Cortisol and many other physiological parameters are non-specific and do not indicate if the experience was positive (e.g., excitement, arousal) or negative (e.g., pain, fear, hunger).…”
Section: Some Animal-based Indices Provide Welfare Status Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hair strands were stuck on paper with adhesive tape (Lyreco, Marly, France) with clear indication of the hair root, and stored in an envelope at room temperature. The thought was to conduct hair analysis as an indicator of eg stress, 41,42 but no specific studies are planned yet.…”
Section: Hair Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%