A Systematic Review of the Abdominal Surgeon’s Personality: Exploring Common Traits in Western Populations

Abstract

The personality traits commonly seen in abdominal surgeons remains undefined, and its potential influence on decision-making and patient outcomes underexplored. This systematic review identified studies on abdominal surgeons who had undergone validated personality testing, with assessment of decision-making and post-operative patient outcomes. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (University of York, UK (CRD42019151375)). MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the keywords: surgeon; surgeon personality; outcomes. All study designs were accepted including adult visceral surgeons published in English. Five articles from 3056 abstracts met our inclusion criteria and one article was identified from hand searches with two reviewers screening studies. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Six studies included 386 surgeons. Studies assessing personality using the Five Factor Model (four studies, 329 surgeons) demonstrated higher levels of conscientiousness (self-discipline, thoughtfulness), extraversion (sociability, emotional expression) and openness (creative, conventional) in surgeons versus population norms. Surgeon characterisation of agreeableness and emotional stability was less clear, with studies reporting mixed results. Post-operative outcomes were reported by only one study. Further exploration of the influence of surgeon personality and its influence on decision-making is necessary to deliver patient-centred care and targeted non-technical skills training for surgeons.

Exploring variation in surgical practice: does surgeon personality influence anastomotic decision-making?

“…Colorectal surgeons had higher levels of emotional stability (even-temperedness) than the general population and possessed lower-than-average levels of agreeableness (tendency towards conflict), extraversion (tendency towards enthusiasm, assertiveness), and openness to experience (tendency towards fixed thinking, routine), with some support for our findings from a recent systematic review on abdominal surgeon personality (high levels of conscientiousness) 15 . Interestingly, female surgeons had lower levels of openness than male surgeons, differing from what is commonly found in the general population 35 , 36 .…”

The impact of a pathologist’s personality on the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in lung cancer

“…[21] A systematic review conducted in 2020 sought to include studies in which the personality of surgeons was assessed, and found two studies reporting on perioperative decision making and/or postoperative outcomes. [22] High scores for conscientiousness and openness affected decision making with respect to the choice between making an anastomosis or a stoma. [23] In a real-life setting, surgeons with high levels of 'constructive' and 'passive/defensive' personality styles had fewer adverse events in bariatric surgery than surgeons with other styles.…”

Risk taking propensity: Nurse, surgeon and patient preferences for diverting ileostomy

“…A 2020 systematic review sought to explore common traits in the abdominal surgeons' personality [ 14 ]. The authors found that surgeon specific factors influence decision‐making and proposed the Five Factor Model for future research.…”

“…Whilst the personality factors of surgeons that affect their decisions are clearly important and relevant [ 14 ], this study aimed to elucidate the nurse, surgeon and patient preferences for temporary diverting ileostomies (TDI) and evaluate any discrepancies through a series of three clinical scenarios and delivered by standardised, supervised participant interview. The preferences were ascertained by the validated prospective measures of preference: standard gamble (PMPsg) and time trade off (PMPtto) instruments.…”