2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl012026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic test of the hypothesis that the b value varies with depth in California

Abstract: Abstract. We spatially map the shallow to deep b value ratio in the crust in California. Previous studies of the frequency magnitude distribution, as a function of depth, for selected crustal regions indicated that b decreases from b > 1.1 in the 0-5 km depth range to b < 0.8 in the depth range 7-15 km. Our detailed mapping confirms that this pattern can be established at the 99% significance level for about 32% of the entire seismically active crust. About 2% of the crust displays the opposite b-gradient. One… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
71
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(13 reference statements)
15
71
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The global upward migration of seismicity is driven by the shallow shallow seismicity pattern. trano, 2003) and reported for genuine earthquakes (e.g., Mori and Abercombie, 1997;Gerstenberger et al, 2001, Sue et al, 2002. Another alternative is that the b-value variations are the result of shallow earthquakes moving toward the surface: the closer an event to the Earth's surface, the less the probability that a large earthquake would occur at such a depth; hence the seismicity near the surface is depleted of large shocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global upward migration of seismicity is driven by the shallow shallow seismicity pattern. trano, 2003) and reported for genuine earthquakes (e.g., Mori and Abercombie, 1997;Gerstenberger et al, 2001, Sue et al, 2002. Another alternative is that the b-value variations are the result of shallow earthquakes moving toward the surface: the closer an event to the Earth's surface, the less the probability that a large earthquake would occur at such a depth; hence the seismicity near the surface is depleted of large shocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory experiments (e.g., MOGI, 1962;SCHOLZ, 1968;MEREDITH et al, 1990;AMITRANO, 2003) and in mines (URBANCIC et al, 1992), they observe correlations between the b-values and stress. In the case of natural earthquakes, it has also been observed that the b-values change with depth, possibly owing to increasing stress with depth (e.g., MORI and ABERCROMBIE, 1997;GERSTENBERGER et al, 2001;SUE et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong spatial variations of the earthquake size distribution expressed in terms of the b-value, on scales of 1-50 km, have also been determined in different tectonic regimes, ranging from small scales, such as volcanic systems (Wiemer and McNutt, 1997;Wiemer et al, 1998), to regional scales (e.g., Ogata et al, 1991;, Gerstenberger et al, 2001a. Stress is also a factor involved in perturbing the b-value (Urbancic et al, 1992;Wyss, 1973;Lahaie and Grasso, 1999;Wiemer and Wyss, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%