2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic view on the effect of microbial phytase on ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cannulation has been shown to produce generally lower AA digestibility response levels due to the potential for microbial proliferation and/or inflammation around the cannulation site (Selle and Ravindran, 2008). However, it has also been suggested that flushing the digesta from the distal ileum (used in the current study) may limit the opportunity for AA absorption and this may also reduce AA digestibility estimates (Cowieson et al, 2017a). In broilers, a greater improvement on digestibility of AA (mean AA by 9.2 percentage points across diets with different Ca:P ratios) was seen with the addition of 1,000 FTU/kg Buttiauxella phytase (Amerah et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cannulation has been shown to produce generally lower AA digestibility response levels due to the potential for microbial proliferation and/or inflammation around the cannulation site (Selle and Ravindran, 2008). However, it has also been suggested that flushing the digesta from the distal ileum (used in the current study) may limit the opportunity for AA absorption and this may also reduce AA digestibility estimates (Cowieson et al, 2017a). In broilers, a greater improvement on digestibility of AA (mean AA by 9.2 percentage points across diets with different Ca:P ratios) was seen with the addition of 1,000 FTU/kg Buttiauxella phytase (Amerah et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may partially be explained by the effects of phytate on protein digestibility and that endogenous protein flow may be less consistent and weaker in pigs than poultry (Cowieson and Ravindran, 2007; Woyengo et al, 2009). Recent reviews based on meta-analyses have reported lower effect levels for phytase supplementation on AA digestibility in pigs compared with poultry (Cowieson et al, 2017a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar review was done in pigs (Cowieson et al, 2017b), based on a meta-analysis of 28 peer reviewed papers using different sources of phytase with a dose Figure 4. Predicted and actual measured Lys digestibility coefficient based on seven ileal digestible AA studies in broilers at 21 days of age (Plumstead et al, 2013 presented at IPSF) Figure 5.…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Animal Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 One pig per pen was euthanized and fibulas were used to determine bone ash weight and percentage bone ash. (Madrid et al, 2013) and amino acid digestibility through the decrease of antinutritional effects of phytate and its derivates (Cowieson et al, 2017;Zouaoui et al, 2018). Zeng et al (2014) reported an increase in the apparent ileal digestibility of DM (using 1,000 to 20,000 FTU/kg), but Zeng et al (2016) using 0 to 20,000 FTU/ kg and She et al (2018) using 0 to 4,000 FTU/ kg, did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%