2019
DOI: 10.21079/11681/34855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systems approach to ecosystem adaptive management : a USACE technical guide

Abstract: Implementation guidance for Sections 2036 and 2039 of WRDA 2007 and Section 1161 of WRDA 2016 requires that ecosystem restoration projects either include appropriately scoped monitoring and adaptive management plans or provide sound justifications for why adaptive management is not warranted. Under adaptive management, decisions are based on the best available (yet often incomplete and imperfect) scientific data, information, and understanding, recognizing uncertainties that introduce risks to the achievement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, we discuss equity considerations in long‐term life cycle management, as a piece of infrastructure ages, societal objectives shift, and a system evolves in response to expected and unexpected large‐scale change. Importantly, we draw these phases from existing frameworks (e.g., structured decision‐making, Conroy & Peterson, 2013; Gregory & Keeney, 2002; Linkov & Moberg, 2011; federal water planning processes, Bridges et al, 2021; Fischenich et al, 2013; Yoe & Harper, 2017; adaptive management processes, Fischenich et al, 2019; Williams et al, 2009). Our contribution focuses on integrating equity into these project planning and implementation frameworks, not the framework itself.…”
Section: Integrating Equity Into Water Planning Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, we discuss equity considerations in long‐term life cycle management, as a piece of infrastructure ages, societal objectives shift, and a system evolves in response to expected and unexpected large‐scale change. Importantly, we draw these phases from existing frameworks (e.g., structured decision‐making, Conroy & Peterson, 2013; Gregory & Keeney, 2002; Linkov & Moberg, 2011; federal water planning processes, Bridges et al, 2021; Fischenich et al, 2013; Yoe & Harper, 2017; adaptive management processes, Fischenich et al, 2019; Williams et al, 2009). Our contribution focuses on integrating equity into these project planning and implementation frameworks, not the framework itself.…”
Section: Integrating Equity Into Water Planning Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%