A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion torrent, pacific biosciences and illumina MiSeq sequencers

Abstract

BackgroundNext generation sequencing (NGS) technology has revolutionized genomic and genetic research. The pace of change in this area is rapid with three major new sequencing platforms having been released in 2011: Ion Torrent’s PGM, Pacific Biosciences’ RS and the Illumina MiSeq. Here we compare the results obtained with those platforms to the performance of the Illumina HiSeq, the current market leader. In order to compare these platforms, and get sufficient coverage depth to allow meaningful analysis, we have sequenced a set of 4 microbial genomes with mean GC content ranging from 19.3 to 67.7%. Together, these represent a comprehensive range of genome content. Here we report our analysis of that sequence data in terms of coverage distribution, bias, GC distribution, variant detection and accuracy.ResultsSequence generated by Ion Torrent, MiSeq and Pacific Biosciences technologies displays near perfect coverage behaviour on GC-rich, neutral and moderately AT-rich genomes, but a profound bias was observed upon sequencing the extremely AT-rich genome of Plasmodium falciparum on the PGM, resulting in no coverage for approximately 30% of the genome. We analysed the ability to call variants from each platform and found that we could call slightly more variants from Ion Torrent data compared to MiSeq data, but at the expense of a higher false positive rate. Variant calling from Pacific Biosciences data was possible but higher coverage depth was required. Context specific errors were observed in both PGM and MiSeq data, but not in that from the Pacific Biosciences platform.ConclusionsAll three fast turnaround sequencers evaluated here were able to generate usable sequence. However there are key differences between the quality of that data and the applications it will support.

Automated and accurate estimation of gene family abundance from shotgun metagenomes

“…We used Grinder to generate a number of simulated shotgun libraries, which are indicated in the text and can be found online at: http://lighthouse.ucsf.edu/shotmapsims/ Read-length simulations: Here, we generated libraries of varying read length, from 25 to 3,000 base pairs (bp), from the mock community 160319967-stool1 (S2 Table). Each library contained 1.3 million single-end reads, and were generated using a 1% uniform error rate and a 4:1 ratio of substitutions to indels, which is approximately consistent with raw error rates from Illumina sequencing platforms [81]. These libraries were used for the majority of experiments in this study.…”

Graphene nanodevices for DNA sequencing

“…This technology is particularly useful for de-novo sequencing as it allows to read long strands (on average several kbp long). Although sizeable error rates (∼13%) have been reported [8], these errors are random, in contrast to context-specific errors (e.g. palindromic sequences or GC rich contents) that are generally observed in other techniques, such that multiple lower-quality base calls can be aligned to derive high-quality (de-novo) sequence data [9,10].…”

Bacterial biota of women with bacterial vaginosis treated with lactoferrin: an open prospective randomized trial

“…In the present study, culture-based microbiological criteria were coupled with culture-independent methods for in-depth understanding of the overall structure of the vaginal bacterial biota. The approach based on Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a novel high-throughput method with a faster turnaround than other next-generation sequencing techniques [43,44]. Application of the Ion Torrent technology was suitable for the investigation of the bacterial ecology in the BV vaginal ecosystem, allowing us to detect its compositional change at phylum, genus, and species level.…”