2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tale of Two Teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among this most recent IB literature, we single out Velez-Calle et al (2020), who explored the change we had with millennial GVTs, for whom cultural differences are not perceived as constraints as it was assumed in traditional IB literature. Among this most recent organizational management literature, we note Jarvenpaa and Keating (2021) on communication models, Gibson and Grushina (2021) on effectiveness, Richter et al (2021) on cultural intelligence and Stahl and Maznevski (2021) on cultural diversity. This last one, published in the Journal of International Business Studies 10 years after Stahl et al (2010), offers a retrospective of research and suggests an agenda for future research: it updates the reconciliation of conflicting past results through a theoretical framework describing how cultural diversity produces both losses and process gains in teams and specifying the contextual conditions under which diversity contributes to effective team outcomes (Stahl and Maznevski, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among this most recent IB literature, we single out Velez-Calle et al (2020), who explored the change we had with millennial GVTs, for whom cultural differences are not perceived as constraints as it was assumed in traditional IB literature. Among this most recent organizational management literature, we note Jarvenpaa and Keating (2021) on communication models, Gibson and Grushina (2021) on effectiveness, Richter et al (2021) on cultural intelligence and Stahl and Maznevski (2021) on cultural diversity. This last one, published in the Journal of International Business Studies 10 years after Stahl et al (2010), offers a retrospective of research and suggests an agenda for future research: it updates the reconciliation of conflicting past results through a theoretical framework describing how cultural diversity produces both losses and process gains in teams and specifying the contextual conditions under which diversity contributes to effective team outcomes (Stahl and Maznevski, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the factors that are challenging for virtual teams is social factors. there are social challenges, which include issues with poor team cohesion and interdependence, high independence, poor responses, a lack of feelings, a sense of isolation, a lack of audio-visual communication, lower trust, and reduced social interaction when using virtual teams in the workplace (Elyousfi et al, 2021;Kwaye, 2018;Eaidgah et al, 2018;Agbi, 2018;Soon and Salamzadeh, 2020;Gibson and Grushina, 2021;Ioannidis and Makridis, 2020). Other studies have identified five difficulties that virtual teams must overcome: a lack of face-to-face engagement, a lack of trust, a lack of social interaction, a higher concern for reliability, and a lack of physical touch (Soon and Salamzadeh, 2020).…”
Section: Social Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…emails, podcasts, social media) to reach and engage the employees no matter their location. Gibson and Grushina (2021) proposed that strategies to augment effectiveness in global VTs include formalization of objectives and structure, establishing identity, reaching across cultural differences, conflict resolution, instituting technology repertoires and sustaining vitality. Krehl and Büttgen (2022) have revealed that managerial collaborative problem-solving practices, relational and empowering leadership, enhanced communication and building a culture of trust were effective practices in a crisis situation induced by the Covid-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Knowledge Management In Virtual Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%