2020
DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A targeted sequence capture array for phylogenetics and population genomics in the Salicaceae

Abstract: Premise The family Salicaceae has proved taxonomically challenging, especially in the genus Salix, which is speciose and features frequent hybridization and polyploidy. Past efforts to reconstruct the phylogeny with molecular barcodes have failed to resolve the species relationships of many sections of the genus. Methods We used the wealth of sequence data in the family to design sequence capture probes to target regions of 300–1200 bp of exonic regions of 972 genes. Results We recovered sequence data for near… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative cost effectiveness and the fact that it works well also with degraded DNA, which is common among extractions of herbarium specimens, are some benefits of this approach ( McKain et al, 2018 ; Johnson et al, 2019 ). The probe set used may be specifically designed for the group of study (e.g., Vatanparast et al, 2018 ; Sanderson et al, 2020 ) or designed to be universally applicable across larger groups such as the Angiosperms353 probe kit ( Johnson et al, 2019 ). The large amount and heterogeneity of the data generated for phylogenomic studies do, however, not come without challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative cost effectiveness and the fact that it works well also with degraded DNA, which is common among extractions of herbarium specimens, are some benefits of this approach ( McKain et al, 2018 ; Johnson et al, 2019 ). The probe set used may be specifically designed for the group of study (e.g., Vatanparast et al, 2018 ; Sanderson et al, 2020 ) or designed to be universally applicable across larger groups such as the Angiosperms353 probe kit ( Johnson et al, 2019 ). The large amount and heterogeneity of the data generated for phylogenomic studies do, however, not come without challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target capture has been successfully applied to resolve phylogenies in diverse groups, from arthropods such as bees ( Xylocopa , Blaimer et al, 2016 ; Apidae, Bossert et al, 2019 ) and Araneae (Hexathelidae, Hedin et al, 2018 ) to mammals (Cetacea, McGowen et al, 2020 ), and in numerous plant groups ( Heuchera , Folk et al, 2015 ; Gesneriaceae, Ogutcen et al, 2021 ; Zingiberales, Sass et al, 2016 to name a few). The method's utility for studies at microevolutionary scales has been to date marginally explored, but several studies have pointed to the ability to analyse genomic diversity and estimate population genomic parameters (Choquet et al, 2019 ; Christmas et al, 2017 ; Derrien & Ramos‐Onsins, 2020 ; de La Harpe et al, 2019 ; Sanderson et al, 2020 ). Nonetheless, the development of probes for target enrichment may pose several challenges: first, the need to identify regions conserved enough to ensure recovery, yet polymorphic enough to provide ample information (Soto‐Gomez et al, 2019 ; Villaverde et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result shows how the bait set is robust to capture a large number of genes, even when the enrichment reaction did not meet expectations (e.g., for G. aesculifolia with 4.4% of on-target reads). Here we applied a great depth of sequence, higher than that applied in other studies (e.g., Soto Gomez et al, 2019 ; Jantzen et al, 2020 ; Sanderson et al, 2020 ; Eserman et al, 2021 ). The sequencing depth and laboratory protocols applied during library preparation and enrichment reaction are relevant variables controlling the number of reads on target, the number of genes recovered, or the total length of the genes compared to the reference ( Johnson et al, 2016 ; Anderman et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%