1997
DOI: 10.2307/1224098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxonomic information model for botanical databases: the IOPI Model

Abstract: Summary Berendsohn, W. G.: A taxonomic information model for botanical databases: the IOPI Model – Taxon 46: 283‐309. 1997. – ISSN 0040‐0262. A comprehensive information model for the recording of taxonomic data from literature and other sources is presented, which was devised for the Global Plant Checklist database project of the International Organisation of Plant Information (IOPI). The model is based on an approach using hierarchical decomposition of data areas into atomic data elements and – in parallel –… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This implementation improves on prior attempts at implementing taxonomies which according to Berendsohn (1997) often suffer from "a frequent error of over-simplification of taxonomic data by non-taxonomist database designers" (quoted after Pullan et al (2000)). A first main achievement of Prometheus is a clear separation of the specimenbased classification and the nomenclature-based name hierarchy.…”
Section: The Prometheus Projectmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This implementation improves on prior attempts at implementing taxonomies which according to Berendsohn (1997) often suffer from "a frequent error of over-simplification of taxonomic data by non-taxonomist database designers" (quoted after Pullan et al (2000)). A first main achievement of Prometheus is a clear separation of the specimenbased classification and the nomenclature-based name hierarchy.…”
Section: The Prometheus Projectmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The past debate on biological databases has mainly focused on the best model to be used in organizing the taxonomic data from literature and other sources to avoid over-simplification and to reflect the elasticity of taxonomy as well as alternative taxonomies (see, i.e., Berendsohn 1997, Conn 2003. Even though the "unofficial" adoption of one or more of the alternative taxonomies can not be avoided in the daily work, taxonomic information may become outdated very rapidly in the tropics, and this perhaps tends to reduce taxonomic decisions in the database system to a minimum.…”
Section: Epidendramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the Association of Systematics Collections (ASC) draft datamodel [4], the HICLAS model [5,9,15], the International Organization of Plant Information (IOPI) model [6,7], and the Prometheus model [12]. We will discuss each of these using an extended entity-relationship (ER) data modeling vocabulary and notation (Fig.…”
Section: Prior Approaches To Modeling Multiple Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%