A taxonomy and comparison of remote voting schemes

Li, Huian; Kankanala, Abhishek Reddy; Zou, Xukai

doi:10.1109/icccn.2014.6911807

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other interesting systems are: Netvote [17], OV-net [21], Follow My Vote [29] , Polys [2] and Colony [23]. A more comprehensive comparison of voting protocols can be found in [18], [31].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A coercion-resistant blockchain-based E-voting protocol with receipts

Spadafora¹,

Longo²,

Sala³

2023

AMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We propose a decentralized e-voting protocol that is coercionresistant and vote-selling resistant, while being also completely transparent and not receipt-free. We achieve decentralization using blockchain technology. Because of the properties such as transparency, decentralization, and non-repudiation, blockchain is a fundamental technology of great interest in its own right, and it also has large potential when integrated into many other areas. We prove the security of the protocol under the standard DDH assumption on the underlying prime-order cyclic group (e.g. the group of points of an elliptic curve), as well as under standard assumptions on blockchain robustness.

show abstract

“…Other interesting systems are: Netvote [17], OV-net [21], Follow My Vote [29] , Polys [2] and Colony [23]. A more comprehensive comparison of voting protocols can be found in [18], [31].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A coercion-resistant blockchain-based E-voting protocol with receipts

Spadafora¹,

Longo²,

Sala³

2023

AMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such analysis shows difference among these security requirements and aids in design of future schemes. Our conclusion is provided regarding suitability of a particular voting system/scheme under various conditions [11].…”

Section: IImentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Mobility Based Secured E-Voting System

Gajabe¹

2018

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of voting system is to select the leader from people's choice. In our traditional voting system we have problems when it comes to voting. Some of the problems involved include ridging votes during election, inaccessible polling stations, inadequate polling materials, man power is needed, declaration of result take too much time. Because of such problems the percentage of voting is getting decrease year by year. So this E-voting system try to address the above issues. candidates will able to vote from their places using internet connection. In this system we assuming that 80% to 90% of people have a smart phone so we will try to design a Smartphone compatible application. In this application we will authenticate the user by its aadhar card number , mobile number or by his/her email addresses. After authenticating user will able to see list of candidates. and user can vote to their favorite candidate ,Then the vote of user will be stored on database server in encrypted formats using encryption algorithm. This transmission of data from user application to database server will be encrypted by using cryptography . The main aim of the work is to allow mobile users for e-voting . It will verify whether the voting is done by an authorized user or not and provide the vote count after e-voting

show abstract

“…Remote E-voting systems, as voting systems, are supposed to have basic functional properties, such as correctness, democracy, fairness, accountability and transparency [19] [18] [15]. However, in this paper we mainly focus on the following properties related to security.…”

Section: Security Properties Of Remote E-voting Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although we mentioned receipt-freeness, the focus of interest of [19] is to provide a general survey for existing remote Evoting systems' primary cryptographic techniques: mix-nets, blind signature, threshold homomorphic encryption and secret sharing. In this paper, we specifically focus on three important security properties related to voters: receipt-freeness, voteselling resistance and voter-coercion resistance.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In our previous paper [19], we classified remote E-voting systems into four categories based on how they achieve vote-privacy. Although we mentioned receipt-freeness, the focus of interest of [19] is to provide a general survey for existing remote Evoting systems' primary cryptographic techniques: mix-nets, blind signature, threshold homomorphic encryption and secret sharing.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Receipt-freeness and coercion resistance in remote E-voting systems

Ruan

Zou

2017

IJSN

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remote Electronic Voting (E-voting) is a more convenient and efficient methodology when compared with traditional voting systems. It allows voters to vote for candidates remotely, however, remote E-voting systems have not yet been widely deployed in practical elections due to several potential security issues, such as vote-privacy, robustness and verifiability. Attackers' targets can be either voting machines or voters. In this paper, we mainly focus on three important security properties related to voters: receipt-freeness, voteselling resistance, and voter-coercion resistance. In such scenarios, voters are willing or forced to cooperate with attackers. We provide a survey of existing remote E-voting systems, to see whether or not they are able to satisfy these three properties to avoid corresponding attacks. Furthermore, we identify and summarize what mechanisms they use in order to satisfy these three security properties.

show abstract

A taxonomy and comparison of remote voting schemes

Cited by 15 publications

References 47 publications

A coercion-resistant blockchain-based E-voting protocol with receipts

A coercion-resistant blockchain-based E-voting protocol with receipts

Implementation of Mobility Based Secured E-Voting System

Receipt-freeness and coercion resistance in remote E-voting systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About