Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Taxonomy of Empathetic Response Intents in Human Social Conversations

Abstract: Open-domain conversational agents or chatbots are becoming increasingly popular in the natural language processing community. One of the challenges is enabling them to converse in an empathetic manner. Current neural response generation methods rely solely on end-to-end learning from large scale conversation data to generate dialogues. This approach can produce socially unacceptable responses due to the lack of large-scale quality data used to train the neural models. However, recent work has shown the promise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent years have witnessed a boom of research on data-driven analysis and application of empathy in general conversations. In terms of empathy analysis for open-domain conversations, Zhou et al (2021) addressed scoring empathy grounded in specific situations, Welivita and Pu (2020) created a taxonomy of empathetic response intents in social dialogues, while Guda et al (2021) proposed to take user demographic information into account for empathy prediction.…”
Section: Data-driven Text-based Research On Empathy In General Conversationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have witnessed a boom of research on data-driven analysis and application of empathy in general conversations. In terms of empathy analysis for open-domain conversations, Zhou et al (2021) addressed scoring empathy grounded in specific situations, Welivita and Pu (2020) created a taxonomy of empathetic response intents in social dialogues, while Guda et al (2021) proposed to take user demographic information into account for empathy prediction.…”
Section: Data-driven Text-based Research On Empathy In General Conversationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Neutral: Sympathizing) Table 1: An example showing the listener's reactions to emotions do not always mirror the speaker's emotions. Welivita and Pu (2020) have analyzed listener responses in the EmpatheticDialogues dataset (Rashkin et al, 2018) and discovered eight listener specific empathetic response intents contained in emotional dialogues: Questioning; Agreeing; Acknowledging; Sympathizing; Encouraging; Consoling: Suggesting; and Wishing. They have annotated the EmpatheticDialogues dataset with 32 fine-grained emotions, eight empathetic response intents, and the Neutral category, and discovered frequent emotion-intent exchange patterns in empathetic conversations.…”
Section: Speakermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 32 emotions range from basic emotions derived from biological responses (Ekman, 1992;Plutchik, 1984) to larger sets of subtle emotions derived from contextual situations (Skerry and Saxe, 2015). Welivita and Pu (2020) manually analyzed a subset of the listener turns in EmpatheticDialogues and identified eight listener-specific response intents. They developed a sentence-level weak labeler using which they annotated the entire dataset with 32 emotions, eight empathetic response intents, and the Neutral category.…”
Section: Speakermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations