2019
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2019.2891403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A TDOA Localization Method for Nonline-of-Sight Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of the algorithm is that it can weaken the influence of severe NLOS in the mixed environment of LOS/NLOS, but some knowledge of the noise statistics is required in this algorithm, which is actually unknown. A frequency-dependent transfer function is constructed in [ 9 ] to transform the propagation channel in the real scene into the propagation channel in free space, further eliminating the NLOS effect. Simulation results show that the algorithm has higher positioning accuracy than the traditional TDOA method and does not depend on the form of signal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the algorithm is that it can weaken the influence of severe NLOS in the mixed environment of LOS/NLOS, but some knowledge of the noise statistics is required in this algorithm, which is actually unknown. A frequency-dependent transfer function is constructed in [ 9 ] to transform the propagation channel in the real scene into the propagation channel in free space, further eliminating the NLOS effect. Simulation results show that the algorithm has higher positioning accuracy than the traditional TDOA method and does not depend on the form of signal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 17 ], the authors transform the new robust weighted least squares problem into a non-convex optimization problem through the S-Lemma, so that the optimal target position is obtained. Because the frequency of signal is hard to affect during propagation, the authors in [ 18 ] establish a frequency and position transfer function by linking the field where a receiver is given to the source, which not only mitigates the NLOS effect but also calibrates the propagation channel back to free space, thus the performance is better than the usual TDOA positioning algorithm. For the purpose of avoiding the shortcomings of the robust least square (RLS) methods and reducing the upper limit of the NLOS error, the source location and the NLOS error in the predicted path are jointly estimated in [ 19 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, range-based approaches determine the location of sensor nodes using various ranging methods and provide an accurate location [19]. Ranging methods can be classified into four categories [20]: Time of Arrival (TOA) [21,22,23,24], Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) [25,26,27], Angle of Arrival (AOA) [28,29,30] and Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) [31,32,33]. In underwater environments, distance information obtained by the TOA method is usually used, such as wide coverage positioning system (WPS) [34], GPS-less localization protocol (GPS-less) [35], motion-aware sensor localization (MASL) [36], underwater sparse positioning (USP) [37] and 3D underwater localization (3DUL) [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%