1970
DOI: 10.2307/2401619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Technique for Determining Resistance to Mass Transfer Through the Boundary Layers of Plants with Complex Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The air of the cuvette was well stirred giving a boundary layer conductance to CO2 of 4.6 mol m 2 s -1 for a shoot of Norway spruce. The boundary-layer conductance was determined by the plaster cast method of Landsberg and Ludlow (1970). Air temperature in the cuvette was 18.3 _+ 0.5 ~ C and needle temperature was 18.9___0.7~ Air temperature was measured using a Pt-100 sensor and needle temperature by pressing a thermocouple (type K, Ni: Cr/Ni, Tradonor, Stockholm) against the lower side of the needles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air of the cuvette was well stirred giving a boundary layer conductance to CO2 of 4.6 mol m 2 s -1 for a shoot of Norway spruce. The boundary-layer conductance was determined by the plaster cast method of Landsberg and Ludlow (1970). Air temperature in the cuvette was 18.3 _+ 0.5 ~ C and needle temperature was 18.9___0.7~ Air temperature was measured using a Pt-100 sensor and needle temperature by pressing a thermocouple (type K, Ni: Cr/Ni, Tradonor, Stockholm) against the lower side of the needles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, then equations applicable to a totally wet canopy become applicable when the fraction of the surface covered in water, the 'Wetness Factor', W, is large enough to allow the Intrinsic Surface Resistance to water-vapour flux, RI" (Shuttleworth, 1975), to 'short-cut' the stomata1 resistance and reduce the resulting 'internal' part of the surface resistance for each element to such an extent as to make it negligible compared to the 'boundary-layer' part. Assuming the theoretical estimate RI"-0.05 s m-r given by Shuttleworth (1975), this might occur when the element is only a few per cent wet, even for elements with very little 'boundary-layer' resistance (20 s m-') such as Sitka spruce (Landsberg and Ludlow, 1970).…”
Section: The Evaporation/condensation Exchange Process (A) a Simplifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure A2(a) illustrates the variation of the weighting factor [x3N] as a function of x, for the extreme values of n and a (Equation AlO) used in the calculations, while Figure A2(b) shows the value of impaction efficiency (at a wind speed of 1 m s-r) plotted as a function of drop-size for cylinder 1 mm in diameter. This value was chosen as typical of the needle diameter for Sitka spruce (Landsberg and Ludlow, 1970) and Scats pine (Roberts, 1976). The efficiency was deduced from the function illustrated in Figure Al integration of Equation A6) for cylindrical vegetative elements 1 mm in diameter.…”
Section: (D) Drop-size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigators have measured aerodynamic resistances to heat transfer for coniferous shoots (10,11) and Jarvis et al (7) converted their values to equivalent R' values. These R' values ranged from 2.8 to 15.8 s m-1 for various orientations to wind flows of from 35 to 520 cm s-', respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%