Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data - SIGMOD '96 1996
DOI: 10.1145/233269.233321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Teradata content-based multimedia object manager for massively parallel architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parallel databases are typically deployed in a sharednothing MPP architecture, such as Teradata [6], Aster Data [7] and Greenplum [8]. They are high performance computing platform.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel databases are typically deployed in a sharednothing MPP architecture, such as Teradata [6], Aster Data [7] and Greenplum [8]. They are high performance computing platform.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, on some systems such as Teradata [3,22], system internal data in query processing is converted to strings to pass in UDFs, which is easy for the application developer to deal with but incurs significant overhead, particularly in per-tuple processing. As reported in [20,21], with SQL Server, no matter how simple a UDF is, it significantly underperforms compared to a system function or expression.…”
Section: The Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For making UDFs practically tractable, on some systems such as SQL Server and Teradata [3,22], the input of a UDF is converted to a string from the values in the system internal formats for query processing. With such a mechanism, as reported in [20,21], no matter how simple a UDF is, it significantly underperforms compared with a system function or expression.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.6.1.2 Term Context Instead of relying on term co-occurrence, some work uses the context (surrounding terms) of each term to construct the vectors that represent each term [Gauch and Wang, 1996]. The problem with the vectors given above is that they do not differentiate the senses of the words.…”
Section: 611mentioning
confidence: 99%