2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24630-5_78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Term Weighting Method Based on Lexical Chain for Automatic Summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former one, directly extracting sentences from the texts, is widely used because it is not restricted to text domain and genre. Most extractive summarization tasks are regarded as sentence ranking problems, which can be roughly divided into three types: 1) statistical feature based methods [5], [6], which simply consider term frequency, sentence position and length, title and clue words; 2) lexical chain based methods [7], which construct chains of related words with the help of lexicon such as WordNet, and select strong chains to extract salient sentences according to some standards; 3) graph ranking based methods such as LexRank [8] and TextRank [4], which use PageRank [9] to rank the text graph. Nevertheless, traditional text summarization methods are unable to satisfy the need of microblog summarization due to the severe sparsity, heavy noise and bad format of posts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former one, directly extracting sentences from the texts, is widely used because it is not restricted to text domain and genre. Most extractive summarization tasks are regarded as sentence ranking problems, which can be roughly divided into three types: 1) statistical feature based methods [5], [6], which simply consider term frequency, sentence position and length, title and clue words; 2) lexical chain based methods [7], which construct chains of related words with the help of lexicon such as WordNet, and select strong chains to extract salient sentences according to some standards; 3) graph ranking based methods such as LexRank [8] and TextRank [4], which use PageRank [9] to rank the text graph. Nevertheless, traditional text summarization methods are unable to satisfy the need of microblog summarization due to the severe sparsity, heavy noise and bad format of posts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [12] derives relevance of a term from an ontology constructed with formal concept analysis. Song et al [2] basically weight a word basing on the number of lexical connections, such as semantic associations expressed in a thesaurus, that the word has with its neighboring words; along with this, more frequent words are weighted higher. Mihalcea [13,14] presents a similar idea in the form of a neat, clear graph-based formalism: the words that have closer relationships with a greater number of "important" words become more important themselves, the importance being determined in a recursive way similar to the PageRank algorithm used by Google to weight web pages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, some approaches claim being domain and language independent, they use some degree of language knowledge like lexical information [2], key-phrases [3] or golden samples for supervised learning approaches [4][5][6]. Furthermore, training on a specific domain tends to customize the extraction process to that domain, so the resulting classifier is not necessarily portable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [6] derives relevance of a term from an ontology constructed with formal concept analysis. Song et al [3] basically weight a word basing on the number of lexical connections, such as semantic associations expressed in a thesaurus, that the word has with its neighboring words; along with this, more frequent words are weighted higher. Mihalcea [15] presents a similar idea in the form of a neat, clear graph-based formalism: the words that have closer relationships with a greater number of "important" words become more important themselves, the importance being determined in a recursive way similar to the PageRank algorithm used by Google to weight webpages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%