2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2005.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of different factors influencing the isotopic signal of planktonic foraminifera in surface sediments from the northern South China Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
41
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…At Site 1058, we measured the stable isotopic composition of both morphologies in 38 intervals. Consistent with the results of Wang (2000) and Löwenmark et al (2005) we find that on average the G. ruber s.s. has lower δ 18 O values than G. ruber s.l. (by ∼0.3‰) (Fig.…”
Section: Planktonic Foraminiferasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At Site 1058, we measured the stable isotopic composition of both morphologies in 38 intervals. Consistent with the results of Wang (2000) and Löwenmark et al (2005) we find that on average the G. ruber s.s. has lower δ 18 O values than G. ruber s.l. (by ∼0.3‰) (Fig.…”
Section: Planktonic Foraminiferasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4). Wang (2000) suggest (and Löwenmark et al (2005) agree) that the isotopic difference between the morphologies is best explained by calcification of G. ruber s.s. closer to the sea surface than G. ruber s.l. Although the scatter is relatively large at our site (one standard deviation of the mean is 0.4‰) we only use G. ruber s.s. in order to obtain an optimal record of sea surface variability.…”
Section: Planktonic Foraminiferamentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method was chosen despite the fact that the carbon isotopic composition of organic linings in foraminiferal shells is isotopically lighter than the calcite (e.g., Ravelo and Hillaire-Marcel, 2007) due to metabolic (respired) CO 2 bound in the organic linings (Ní Fhlaithearta et al, 2013.). However, experiments on different cleaning techniques of planktonic foraminifera prior to stable isotope analyses have shown that the difference between uncleaned samples and oxidized (organics removed) samples is statistically not significant (Löwemark et al, 2005). These authors even recommended analyzing untreated samples in order to prevent the loss of carbonate material from the later chambers that are thinner and thus preferentially removed during the oxidation step while the initial chambers from a different ontogenetic stage are preserved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is par tic u larly rel e vant for ap pli ca tions on the sub spe cies (morphotype) level, which shows dis tinct ecol ogy with dif fer ent bi o log i cal life styles (e.g., hab i tat pref er ences, sea sonal pro duction max ima, strat i fi ca tion, sa lin ity - Numberger et al, 2009;Antonarakou et al, 2015) and pres ents a dif fer ent de gree of response to the diagenetic pro cesses (Antonarakou et al, 2012) re flected both in their sta ble iso tope com po si tions (Kawahata, 2005;Löwemark et al, 2005;Antonarakou et al, 2015) and Mg/Ca geo chem is try (Steinke et al, 2005;Bergami et al, 2008;Antonarakou et al, 2015). Such speciation can com pli cate field-based cal i bra tions be cause of the pos si bil ity of dis tinct spe cies-spe cific re la tion ships, and there fore it is clear that a better un der stand ing of the shell chem is try of the morphotypes is es sen tial for mean ing ful palaeoenvironmental re con structions (Steinhardt et al, 2015;Antonarakou et al, 2015).…”
Section: Plankton Tow Sediment Trap and Core-top Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%