2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of four innominate bone age assessment methods in a modern skeletal collection from Medellin, Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the included 18 studies were conducted between the years 2007 and 2019. The total number of participants in each meta-analysis was: 1104 (n = 5) [21][22][23] for the Spearman's Rho combined males and females, 1516 (n = 6) [24][25][26][27][28][29] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient combined males and females, 1675 (n = 7) [21,[30][31][32][33][34][35] for the Spearman's Rho male-only, 927 28,[36][37][38] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient male-only, 967 (n = 7) [21,[30][31][32][33]35,38] for the Spearman's Rho female-only, 464 (n = 3) [25, 28,37] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient female-only, 398 (n = 9) [21,24,[31][32][33][34][35], for Cohen's kappa interrater reliability, 383 (n = 5) [21,22,32] for the Spearman's Rho interrater reliability, and 300 (n = 3) [36] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient interrater reliability, 754 (n = 11) [27,28,[31][32]…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the included 18 studies were conducted between the years 2007 and 2019. The total number of participants in each meta-analysis was: 1104 (n = 5) [21][22][23] for the Spearman's Rho combined males and females, 1516 (n = 6) [24][25][26][27][28][29] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient combined males and females, 1675 (n = 7) [21,[30][31][32][33][34][35] for the Spearman's Rho male-only, 927 28,[36][37][38] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient male-only, 967 (n = 7) [21,[30][31][32][33]35,38] for the Spearman's Rho female-only, 464 (n = 3) [25, 28,37] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient female-only, 398 (n = 9) [21,24,[31][32][33][34][35], for Cohen's kappa interrater reliability, 383 (n = 5) [21,22,32] for the Spearman's Rho interrater reliability, and 300 (n = 3) [36] for the Pearson's correlation coefficient interrater reliability, 754 (n = 11) [27,28,[31][32]…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of human remains in the Colombian context is possible thanks to the creation of these collections, which led to the emergence of methods and techniques adapted for the local population, highlighting their importance as a forensic and investigative tool [40]. The Colombian identified osteological collections have been extensively studied, resulting in multiple publications that address the problem of the lack of specific standards for this population regarding the estimation of sex [84,85], age at death [86][87][88][89], individual and population variability [90], and the creation of new technologies [42]. Apart from osteological material, the collections also contain additional imaging resources, e.g., lateral cephalometric radiographs [91], skull base radiographs [92], and biographical data on isotropic values [93].…”
Section: Identified Osteological Collection and The Development Of Sc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the last 20 years, much of the research regarding pelvic-based age-at-death estimation in adults has been based on testing and comparing the accuracy and reliability of the existing methodologies in geographically different documented skeletal collections. Despite that the majority of the research about population-based reliability has been performed in North America (the USA [e.g., [ 17 , 36 , 37 ] and Canada [ 31 ]) and Europe (England [ 33 , 38 , 39 ], Serbia [ 40 ], Poland [ 41 ], Italy [ 42 ], Greece [ 43 45 ], Spain [ 46 , 47 ], France [ 48 ], and Portugal [ 49 ]), there have been some uncommon approaches based on samples from Asia (Thailand [ 20 , 50 , 51 ], Japan [ 52 ], China [ 53 ], and India [ 54 ]), South America (Chile [ 55 ] and Colombia [ 21 , 56 ]), and Africa (South Africa [ 57 , 58 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, most of the publications previously mentioned have included the acetabulum as a unique or part of the age markers within the key research question of the paper. Indeed, the acetabulum has become a focus of aging investigation within the last 10 years [ 18 – 20 , 30 34 , 39 , 49 , 57 , 59 – 64 ], increasingly gaining popularity, reliability, and support from the scientific community linked to anthropological issues and lately appearing often along with other traditional age markers [ 17 , 56 , 65 , 66 ]. Nevertheless, no international study has tested the SanMillán-Rissech method, the most up-to-date method of acetabular age estimation, outside Portugal [ 34 ] or the USA [ 18 ] thus far, except for a recent CT approach based on limited acetabular variables and, unlike the original, using principal component analysis and regression models which have achieved good accuracy results in Indian population [ 64 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%