2012
DOI: 10.1080/10570314.2012.703361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of the Conflict Linkage Model in the Context of Serial Arguments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Honeycutt (2008–2009) reported how the lack of discrepant IIs is associated with relational quality, and other work shows that rehearsal tends to help the planning process. In essence, our studies seem to corroborate others revealing that discrepant IIs are associated with conflict and ruminating about arguments (Honeycutt, 2010b; Hample et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Honeycutt (2008–2009) reported how the lack of discrepant IIs is associated with relational quality, and other work shows that rehearsal tends to help the planning process. In essence, our studies seem to corroborate others revealing that discrepant IIs are associated with conflict and ruminating about arguments (Honeycutt, 2010b; Hample et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, these IIs should be primarily unpleasant. In a similar manner, Conflict Linkage Theory (Honeycutt, ) posits that imagining conflict or recalling a past conflict often results in negative feelings and emotions, a prediction that has been supported with data (see Hample et al, ; Honeycutt, ).…”
Section: Study 1: Comparing II Functions On the Basis Of Attributesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In general, positive serial argument goals have been associated with increased perceived resolvability (Bevan et al, 2007) and with the use of integrative conflict tactics (Bevan, 2014;Bevan et al, 2008;Hample, Richards, & Na, 2012). Conversely, negative serial argument goals have been linked with decreased resolvability (Bevan et al, 2007) and distributive and avoidance conflict tactics (Bevan et al, 2008;.…”
Section: Serial Argument Goalsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In close relationship conflicts, a variety of task, relational, and identity goals are likely to be salient (Samp & Solomon, 2005). These goals may be broadly categorized as prosocial or non-prosocial (Hample, Richards, & Na, 2012;Samp & Solomon, 1998). Prosocial goals reflect a concern for one's interaction partner or relationship, whereas non-prosocial goals include concerns such as one's self-interest or completing a task.…”
Section: Initial Goal Importance and Goal Trajectories In Serial Armentioning
confidence: 99%