2021
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.570229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theoretical and Evidence-Based Conceptual Design of MetaDash: An Intelligent Teacher Dashboard to Support Teachers' Decision Making and Students’ Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract: Teachers’ ability to self-regulate their own learning is closely related to their competency to enhance self-regulated learning (SRL) in their students. Accordingly, there is emerging research for the design of teacher dashboards that empower instructors by providing access to quantifiable evidence of student performance and SRL processes. Typically, they capture evidence of student learning and performance to be visualized through activity traces (e.g., bar charts showing correct and incorrect response rates,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a significant element for reflection, since these differences may be due to various factors related to the students' own characteristics, such as digital competences (García-Peñalvo, 2021), cognitive, metacognitive, affective strategies, etc. (Bártolo-Ribeiro et al, 2020;Cloude et al, 2019;Wiedbusch et al, 2021;Yilmaz et al, 2020;Yoon et al, 2021), learning style and their response to Self-regulated learning (Valadas et al, 2017) or teacher characteristics, also related to digital competences and teaching style. These aspects will be addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a significant element for reflection, since these differences may be due to various factors related to the students' own characteristics, such as digital competences (García-Peñalvo, 2021), cognitive, metacognitive, affective strategies, etc. (Bártolo-Ribeiro et al, 2020;Cloude et al, 2019;Wiedbusch et al, 2021;Yilmaz et al, 2020;Yoon et al, 2021), learning style and their response to Self-regulated learning (Valadas et al, 2017) or teacher characteristics, also related to digital competences and teaching style. These aspects will be addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, LMSs allow for continuous monitoring and adaptation to the student's learning pace, which increases the use of metacognitive and motivational strategies during the learning process (Cloude et al, 2019). All of which will facilitate the generalisation of metacognitive skills to achieve learning objectives (Wiedbusch et al, 2021). Therefore, in this environment, collaborative student work in small groups can be implemented, which will facilitate the work dynamics within the PBL methodology (Shanmuganeethi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Project-based Learning Flipped Classroom and Self-regulated Learning In Virtual Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way is the use of teacher dashboards, which provide teachers with elaborated information about students’ learning processes. Further, teacher dashboards can automatically suggest support measures for specific learners (see Wiedbusch et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Adaptivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considerable research is still required. Implementing game-learning analytics in the classroom for instructional decision making will also require additional support and technological resources, such as a dashboard to illustrate data visualizations for sense making that are currently unavailable to most teachers (Perez-Colado et al, 2017;Cloude, Dever, Wiedbusch, & Azevedo, 2020;Wiedbusch et al, 2021;Roll & Winne, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When is the ideal time to prompt learners to reflect, and does that time vary based on the learning goal and environment? Researchers should also consider the role of adolescents' motivation, cognitive load, or level of knowledge of problem solving, since game-learning analytics data could help pinpoint when learners are not engaging in reflection (e.g., if the quality of solution-based reflection and motivation is low) to inform instructional decision making (Winne et al, 2019;Winne, 2017;Cloude et al, 2020;Wiedbusch et al, 2021).…”
Section: To What Extent Do the Quantity And Quality Of Reflections Predict Post-test Scores While Controllingmentioning
confidence: 99%