2005
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance

Abstract: In general, perceptions of information systems (IS) success have been investigated within two primary research streams—the user satisfaction literature and the technology acceptance literature. These two approaches have been developed in parallel and have not been reconciled or integrated. This paper develops an integrated research model that distinguishes beliefs and attitudes about the system (i.e., object-based beliefs and attitudes) from beliefs and attitudes about using the system (i.e., behavioral belief… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

47
1,328
4
58

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,037 publications
(1,611 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
47
1,328
4
58
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the literature surveyed, WIAR technology characteristics could be hypothesized to have non-random impacts on perceived ease of use and usefulness, two traditional technology acceptance variables, as well as on decision performance, and decision processes. Following Orlikowski and Iacono (2001) and Wixom and Todd (2005), the link between technology characteristics, context and decision processes and performance could similarly be explored. Positive impacts on decision performance might be defined as improved situation awareness, threat avoidance, situation monitoring, and voyage plan monitoring, consistent with the navigational performance variables codified in the International Rules for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea (International Maritime Organization, 1989).…”
Section: A Rt H a G R A B Ow S K I Vol 68mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the literature surveyed, WIAR technology characteristics could be hypothesized to have non-random impacts on perceived ease of use and usefulness, two traditional technology acceptance variables, as well as on decision performance, and decision processes. Following Orlikowski and Iacono (2001) and Wixom and Todd (2005), the link between technology characteristics, context and decision processes and performance could similarly be explored. Positive impacts on decision performance might be defined as improved situation awareness, threat avoidance, situation monitoring, and voyage plan monitoring, consistent with the navigational performance variables codified in the International Rules for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea (International Maritime Organization, 1989).…”
Section: A Rt H a G R A B Ow S K I Vol 68mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All constructs' measurements are adopted from previous studies. Individual performance is a dependent construct, its measurements are adopted from Igbaria and Tan [52] and Kositanurit, Osei-Bryson [25].User's satisfaction is a mediating construct, its measurements are adopted from Palvia [60] and Wixom and Todd [61]. The three independent constructs are: perceived processing, and its measures are adopted from Brandon-Jones and Carey [33]; perceived content and its measures are adopted from Brandon-Jones and Carey [33] and Hou [24]; perceived usability with measures that are adopted from Brandon-Jones and Carey [33] and Davis [62] (see Appendix).…”
Section: B Measures Of the Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is precisely what we want to look into, rather than investigating the quality or the utility of a tangible workshop's output such as a service box. We will not do a literature review here but we will use [23] as a starting point. They propose "an integrated research model that distinguishes beliefs and attitudes about the system from beliefs and attitudes about using the system".…”
Section: Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose "an integrated research model that distinguishes beliefs and attitudes about the system from beliefs and attitudes about using the system". To survey the behaviour of using technology [23] rely on the well-known technology acceptance model (TAM) developed by [24]. This theory suggests that users confronted to a new technology are influenced in their use by the:  Perceived usefulness: Davis defines it as "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her job performance";  Perceived ease-of-use: Davis describes this as "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free from effort".…”
Section: Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%