2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study on the metal contacts of monolayer gallium nitride (GaN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4(a), ESI†). 38 This leads us to consider the Ti 3 C 2 O 2 /SiC (B) configuration. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4(a), ESI†). 38 This leads us to consider the Ti 3 C 2 O 2 /SiC (B) configuration. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the geometry optimization, the Brillouin zone was sampled by 5 × 5 × 1 Monk horst-Pack k -point meshes, whereas 8 × 8 × 1 k-point meshes were used to calculate the electronic properties. During the calculation, ten atomic layer thickness of GaN were chosen to simulate the bulk GaN crystal, since the calculated results would reveal little change beyond this thickness, where the skill was commonly employed in the previous reports. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the calculation, ten atomic layer thickness of GaN were chosen to simulate the bulk GaN crystal, since the calculated results would reveal little change beyond this thickness, where the skill was commonly employed in the previous reports. 50,51 The top-and side-views of the most stable atomic geometries of monolayer (002) MoS 2 on GaN (001), (010), and (100) planes are illustrated in Figure S4. The obtained optimized distances between MoS 2 and the three GaN planes are 2.75 Å, 2.62 and 2.53 Å, respectively, which are larger than the S−Ga (2.34 Å) and S−N (1.62 Å) bond lengths, 52,53 indicating the van der Waals interaction between MoS 2 and GaN surfaces in the three strucutures.…”
Section: Acs Applied Materials and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Ni, Pd, Cu and Pt metals, which are all with face-centered cubic structures, (111) face is the natural growth face and the most commonly used one in the experiment and rst principles calculations. [20][21][22] While Mg metal has a hexagonal close packed structure, (0001) face is the most commonly used. 23 A vacuum layer of 15Å is set to ensure decoupling between neighboring slabs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%