1996
DOI: 10.1287/isre.7.2.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Decision Support System Design for User Calibration

Abstract: A theory is proposed for designing decision support systems (DSS) so that the confidence a decision maker has in a decision made using the aid equals the quality of that decision. The DSS design theory for user calibration prescribes properties of a DSS needed for users to achieve perfect calibration. Relevant calibration, decision making, and DSS literatures are synthesized; and related behavioral theories are borrowed to identify the properties of expressiveness, visibility, and inquirability as requisite co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter are computer-based technologies designed to assist an individual (or a group) in making a decision or choosing a course of action in a nonroutine situation that requires judgment (Kasper 1996). Decision support systems contain one or more tools, or decision aids, that perform distinct information processing tasks or functions (e.g., search a database or sort objects by some criterion).…”
Section: Human Decision Making and Decision Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter are computer-based technologies designed to assist an individual (or a group) in making a decision or choosing a course of action in a nonroutine situation that requires judgment (Kasper 1996). Decision support systems contain one or more tools, or decision aids, that perform distinct information processing tasks or functions (e.g., search a database or sort objects by some criterion).…”
Section: Human Decision Making and Decision Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work remains to be carried out in this area but Kasper (1996) has proposed a theory on how support systems should be designed to enable the user to achieve, what he calls, "perfect calibration". Underpinning this theory is the notion that a person's calibration depends upon two factors: i) what they know and ii) what they think they know and that these factors, in turn, are based on their mental representation of a problem (Gigerenzer et al,1991).…”
Section: ) Manipulating Users' Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is precisely our position; certainly our efforts are complementary to Gregor and Jones. However, while they propose extending knowledge capture by extending the definition of an ISDT, we propose keeping the Walls et al definition of ISDT as almost purely prescriptive and extending knowledge capture with the addition of DREPT. We justify this on several grounds: First, we observe that the ISDT of Walls et al (1992Walls et al ( , 2004) is currently more familiar to the majority of DSRIS practitioners (March & Storey, 2008) and since that ISDT definition guided many past exemplars of DSRIS (Adomavicius, Bockstedt, Gupta, & Kauffman, 2008;Kasper, 1996;Markus et al, 2002;PriesHeje & Baskerville, 2008), it allows us to make highly informative cross-study comparisons. Second, we propose that two distinct modes of knowledge capture intended for quite different purposes -a prescriptive ISDT to capture low-level (construction) design knowledge and DREPT to capture artifact-relevant explanatory-predictive knowledge -are more comprehensible and do not overburden the already "busy", multifaceted Walls et al information representation.…”
Section: Extending Knowledge Capture In Dsris: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In Section 8, we present an epistemological perspective of the framework and relate it to specific activities in the design research activity cycle. Throughout these discussions, abstract points are related to aspects of concrete projects (Kasper, 1996;Kuechler & Vaishnavi, 2008b;). In Section 9, to demonstrate the utility of the framework, we extend several published examples of DSRIS with proposals for mid-range theories that derive logically from the constructs in the kernel theories and the design theories of the examples.…”
Section: Extending Knowledge Capture In Dsris: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%