2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19981-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A therapeutic combination of two small molecule toxin inhibitors provides broad preclinical efficacy against viper snakebite

Abstract: Snakebite is a medical emergency causing high mortality and morbidity in rural tropical communities that typically experience delayed access to unaffordable therapeutics. Viperid snakes are responsible for the majority of envenomings, but extensive interspecific variation in venom composition dictates that different antivenom treatments are used in different parts of the world, resulting in clinical and financial snakebite management challenges. Here, we show that a number of repurposed Phase 2-approved small … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
158
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
158
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work should undertake head-tohead comparisons between Prinomastat and DMPS using the presently used methodology and with a larger species pool (including Echis) to ascertain if DMPS consistently performs less efficiently than Prinomastat. However, in another study DMPS was conspicuously unable to neutralize Daboia russelii venom (155), which exerts its powerfully procoagulant effect via SVMPinduced Factor X activation like the neonate C. culminatus venom in this study. This suggests two future hypotheses to test.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Future work should undertake head-tohead comparisons between Prinomastat and DMPS using the presently used methodology and with a larger species pool (including Echis) to ascertain if DMPS consistently performs less efficiently than Prinomastat. However, in another study DMPS was conspicuously unable to neutralize Daboia russelii venom (155), which exerts its powerfully procoagulant effect via SVMPinduced Factor X activation like the neonate C. culminatus venom in this study. This suggests two future hypotheses to test.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, a general target-based approach would help to treat the major clinical profiles of envenomation. For example, small molecule inhibitors specific against svMP (Batimastat and Marimastat), PLA 2 (Varespladib) or svSP (Nafamostat), the three most common toxin families in Viperinae, were already successfully tested against certain viperid venoms [ 15 , 220 , 221 , 222 ]. However, for many new potential antivenom therapies, clinical trials for their use against snakebites have not yet been carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, snakebite envenomation affect over 2.7 million people per year, which gives snakebites a great medical importance and concomitantly more global attention [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Among the most dangerous true vipers, in terms of highest mortality, are the African Bitis arietans (puff adder) and Echis ocellatus (West African saw-scaled viper), as well as two of India’s ‘Big Four’, namely, Echis carinatus (Asian saw-scaled viper) and Daboia russelii (Russell’s viper) [ 12 , 15 ]. Nevertheless, viperid bites are also a critical health issue in the Middle East and even Europe [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these novel alternatives are: human monoclonal antibody with different types of antibody formats i.e. whole IgG, single-chain variable fragments (scFvs), antigen binding fragments (Fabs and F(ab') 2 ) (12), oligonucleotide aptamers (13), inhibitors of enzymatic toxins (14), inhibitors of phospholipases A 2 (15), inhibitors of snake venom proteases (16,17), inhibitors of hyaluronidase (18), metal chelators (19)(20)(21) and neuronal acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) mimetics (22). All of these represent promising and interesting alternative therapeutic modalities to improve or replace PDAV, increase effectiveness, cause less adverse effects, and be cheaper to produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%