2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thermodynamically consistent cohesive-frictional interface model for mixed mode delamination

Abstract: We now differentiate between the requirements for new and revised submissions. You may choose to submit your manuscript as a single Word or PDF file to be used in the refereeing process. Only when your paper is at the revision stage, will you be requested to put your paper in to a 'correct format' for acceptance and provide the items required for the publication of your article. To find out more, please visit the Preparation section below. Highlights Highlights are mandatory for this journal as they help incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5), at ves dierent loading steps: a) u x = 5mm; b) u x = 10mm; c) u x = 15mm; d) u x = 20mm; e) u x = 25mm. Results of numerical simulations with three dierent loading angles γ are compared in Figure 7 with results of small displacement solution and analytical solution, in terms of applied load P vs crack opening displacement d. The good agreement between the dierent solutions can be appreciated, excluding the initial elastic branch for well known motivations induced by elastic beam theory [21].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5), at ves dierent loading steps: a) u x = 5mm; b) u x = 10mm; c) u x = 15mm; d) u x = 20mm; e) u x = 25mm. Results of numerical simulations with three dierent loading angles γ are compared in Figure 7 with results of small displacement solution and analytical solution, in terms of applied load P vs crack opening displacement d. The good agreement between the dierent solutions can be appreciated, excluding the initial elastic branch for well known motivations induced by elastic beam theory [21].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Equation (21) shows that the interface elastic parameters cannot be assumed as constant in the deformed conguration but they linearly depend on the ratio between the areas of undeformed surface and deformed surface.…”
Section: Principle Of Virtual Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, except [15], friction dissipation was not taken into account in these works. Coupling of cohesive models and friction contact was developed after the pioneering work [62], which assumed the friction is activated after complete cohesive failure, in a series of relevant contributions [2,9,19,22,27,36,37,41,42,53,57,61,64] among others, providing, for isothermal configurations, a continuous transition from the cohesive state to the frictional contact state. However, no rigorous proof of the solution existence or the convergence of a numerical scheme to the exact solution was provided in these works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%