2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01411a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three dimensional in vitro glial scar model to investigate the local strain effects from micromotion around neural implants

Abstract: The glial scar formation remains a significant barrier to the long term success of neural probes. Micromotion coupled with mechanical mismatch between the probe and tissue is believed to be a key driver of the inflammatory response. In vitro glial scar models present an intermediate step prior to conventional in vivo histology experiments as they enable the cell-device interactions to be tested on a shorter timescale, with the ability to conduct broader biochemical assays. No established in vitro models have i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long‐term measurements can also be inaccurate representations of naïve brain tissue due to neuron death and local changes in electrochemical signaling due to gliosis and neuroinflammation . Our group has previously demonstrated reduced glial scarring in response to smaller implant diameters, down to 150 µm . Implants that incorporate highly flexible, low‐diameter materials to reduce associated inflammation are thus termed “microinvasive.” Microinvasive implants are capable of targeting deep‐brain structures with increased spatial resolution and minimal scarring .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long‐term measurements can also be inaccurate representations of naïve brain tissue due to neuron death and local changes in electrochemical signaling due to gliosis and neuroinflammation . Our group has previously demonstrated reduced glial scarring in response to smaller implant diameters, down to 150 µm . Implants that incorporate highly flexible, low‐diameter materials to reduce associated inflammation are thus termed “microinvasive.” Microinvasive implants are capable of targeting deep‐brain structures with increased spatial resolution and minimal scarring .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the intrinsic stiffness of the silicon substrate, there has been a rising interest in probes that can be fabricated in flexible biocompatible substrate materials with lower mechanical mismatch between probe and brain tissue 4 . Flexible neuronal probes can be highly conformable, thus reducing the extent of brain tissue displacement, damage and glial scaring upon implantation, and providing adaption to brain micro- and macro-motions 4,5,6,7 . These advantages are important for the stability of the brain implant and for improving the quality of the recorded signals, both in acute and chronic in vivo applications 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative micromotion arising from constant, repetitive displacements in tissue due to respiration and vascular pulsations produce strain on tissue surrounding the implant due to mechanical mismatch at the implant-tissue interface for high modulus implants. The differential strain on tissue is considered to be a primary contributor to glial scar formation [ 21 , 22 ], which is further supported by in vitro studies reporting that components of astroglial scarring proliferate in response to mechanical strain [ 23 ] and high modulus substrates [ 24 ], while neurite outgrowth and extension is stimulated on low-modulus substrates with mechanical properties approaching brain tissue ( E brain ~ 10 kPa) [ 25 ]. Intracortical implants based on a lower modulus material reduce the differential strain on tissue during micromotion [ 26 , 27 ], which may also reduce the problematic neuroinflammatory response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%