2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-006-1212-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional variational ocean data assimilation system: Scheme and preliminary results

Abstract: A new 3DVAR-based Ocean Variational Analysis System (OVALS) is developed. OVALS is capable of assimilating in situ sea water temperature and salinity observations and satellite altimetry data. As a component of OVALS, a new variational scheme is proposed to assimilate the sea surface height data. This scheme considers both the vertical correlation of background errors and the nonlinear temperature-salinity relationship which is derived from the generalization of the linear balance constraints to the nonlinear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the 4D-Var data assimilation method pursues the analysis solutions by minimizing the distance between the model trajectory and observation time series [i.e., the so-called cost function (e.g., Tang and Hsieh, 2001;Zhang et al, 2001;Han et al, 2006Han et al, , 2015Peng and Xie, 2006;Zhang et al, 2015b)]. Compared with economic 3D-Var analysis (Derber and Rosati, 1989;Zhu et al, 2006), the 4D-Var data assimilation method is more dynamically and mathematically consistent (e.g., Dommenget and Stammer, 2004;Sugiura et al, 2008). For instance, Weaver et al (2003) assimilated in situ temperature data into an OGCM by the 3D-Var and 4D-Var methods, and demonstrated that 4D-Var is more effective than 3D-Var in producing a consistent ocean state between model solutions and observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 4D-Var data assimilation method pursues the analysis solutions by minimizing the distance between the model trajectory and observation time series [i.e., the so-called cost function (e.g., Tang and Hsieh, 2001;Zhang et al, 2001;Han et al, 2006Han et al, , 2015Peng and Xie, 2006;Zhang et al, 2015b)]. Compared with economic 3D-Var analysis (Derber and Rosati, 1989;Zhu et al, 2006), the 4D-Var data assimilation method is more dynamically and mathematically consistent (e.g., Dommenget and Stammer, 2004;Sugiura et al, 2008). For instance, Weaver et al (2003) assimilated in situ temperature data into an OGCM by the 3D-Var and 4D-Var methods, and demonstrated that 4D-Var is more effective than 3D-Var in producing a consistent ocean state between model solutions and observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this aim, many advanced assimilation methods based on the Kalman filter (e.g. EnKF; Evensen, 2003) and variational methods (3DVAR and 4DVAR) (Zhu et al, 2006;Liu and Yan, 2010;Liu and Zhao, 2011) have widely been used in the areas of ocean and atmospheric modelling. The ensemble optimum interpolation (EnOI) method (Fu et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2013) that will be used in this study is similar to the optimum interpolation (OI) method applied for the operational ocean forecasting system at the SMHI (Pemberton and Funkquist, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the reanalysis data were produced by the Ocean Variational Analysis System (OVALS), which synthesize many currently available observed data including TAO, Expendable Bathythermographs (XBT's), satellite sea surface height (SSH), Argo, etc. (Zhu et al, 2006). The reanalysis data were used to validate model and assimilation results (Yan et al, 2007;Fu et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Validation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%