2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0660-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tiered ecological risk assessment of three chlorophenols in Chinese surface waters

Abstract: Introduction The ecological risks posed by three chlorophenols (CPs), 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP), 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP), and pentachlorophenol (PCP) in Chinese surface waters were assessed. Materials and methods This was achieved by applying a tiered ecological risk assessment (ERA) approach ranging from deterministic methods to probabilistic options to measured concentrations of CPs in surface water of seven major watersheds and three drainage regions in China and the chronic toxicity data for i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worthwhile to note that pronounced adverse effects were observed at the lowest concentration of PCP of the study (i.e. 0.5 mg L À1 ), which is even lower than the aquatic exposure level in China (up to 594.0 ng L À1 ) (Jin et al, 2012b), and this may suggest that the current standards for PCP in drinking water of China (9 mg L À1 , Xia et al, 2004) would not provide enough protection to native aquatic species. Although there were limited evidences for the interruption of PCP on the steroidogenesis of mammalian or human beings, the evidences from present work indicated ecological risk for aquatic animals living in Chinese waters (Jin et al, 2012b), and highlighted the importance of application of data on different toxicological endpoints from sub-chronic or chronic toxicity in risk assessment.…”
Section: Concentration (Mg$lmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is also worthwhile to note that pronounced adverse effects were observed at the lowest concentration of PCP of the study (i.e. 0.5 mg L À1 ), which is even lower than the aquatic exposure level in China (up to 594.0 ng L À1 ) (Jin et al, 2012b), and this may suggest that the current standards for PCP in drinking water of China (9 mg L À1 , Xia et al, 2004) would not provide enough protection to native aquatic species. Although there were limited evidences for the interruption of PCP on the steroidogenesis of mammalian or human beings, the evidences from present work indicated ecological risk for aquatic animals living in Chinese waters (Jin et al, 2012b), and highlighted the importance of application of data on different toxicological endpoints from sub-chronic or chronic toxicity in risk assessment.…”
Section: Concentration (Mg$lmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The probabilistic ecological risk assessment (PERA) was performed by using the Probabilistic Risk Assessment Tool (PRAT) (Solomon et al, 2000(Solomon et al, , 1996. In PERA, estimation of risk is described as being proportional to the degree of overlap of the distributions, and one method of displaying risk is through the use of joint probability curves (JPCs), which describes the probability of a particular set of exposure conditions occurring relative to the number of taxa that would be affected (Jin et al, 2012;Zolezzi et al, 2005). The x-axis of the JPC represents the intensity of effects, while the y-axis represents their probability.…”
Section: Hq ¼ Mecs=pnecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest comparison is a single-point estimate, usually expressed as the hazard quotient (HQ), which is the measured or estimated environmental concentration divided by the toxicant reference value (Jin et al, 2012;Solomon et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2002). Because of its simplicity and effectiveness, the HQ approach is widely used; its use is only appropriate for conservative screening-level risk assessment and for the early stages or tiers of assessment of potential effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discharge of industrial and urban wastewaters, along with the application of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides in farming, have negative impacts on the water quality (Muller et al 2008;Yang et al 2012;Jin et al 2012). These impacts include release of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants as PAHs, together with re-mobilization of polluted sediments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%