2016
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.101214.021015a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Time-Space Adaptive Method for the Schrödinger Equation

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we present a discretization of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation based on a Magnus-Lanczos time integrator and high-order Gauss-Lobatto finite elements in space. A truncated Galerkin orthogonality is used to obtain dualitybased a posteriori error estimates that address the temporal and the spatial error separately. Based on this theory, a space-time adaptive solver for the Schrödinger equation is devised. An efficient matrix-free implementation of the differential operator, suite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of matrix-free evaluation with sum factorization has been widely adopted by now, like in the deal.II [1], DUNE [5,40,60], Firedrake [63], mfem [2], Nek5000 [28] or Nektar++ [13] projects. These fast evaluation techniques are directly applicable to explicit time stepping schemes, as we have demonstrated for wave propagation in [42,53,[65][66][67][68] and the compressible Navier-Stokes equations [24]. The proposed developments make matrix-free evaluation of highorder DG operators reach a throughput in unknowns per second almost as high as for optimized 5-wide finite difference stencils in a CFD context [75], despite delivering much higher accuracy.…”
Section: Implementation Of Sum Factorization In the Dealii Librarymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The concept of matrix-free evaluation with sum factorization has been widely adopted by now, like in the deal.II [1], DUNE [5,40,60], Firedrake [63], mfem [2], Nek5000 [28] or Nektar++ [13] projects. These fast evaluation techniques are directly applicable to explicit time stepping schemes, as we have demonstrated for wave propagation in [42,53,[65][66][67][68] and the compressible Navier-Stokes equations [24]. The proposed developments make matrix-free evaluation of highorder DG operators reach a throughput in unknowns per second almost as high as for optimized 5-wide finite difference stencils in a CFD context [75], despite delivering much higher accuracy.…”
Section: Implementation Of Sum Factorization In the Dealii Librarymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In case of an approximate solution that is defined continuously on the whole domain, the residual is defined as the difference between the continuous differential operator and the approximate difference operator applied to the approximate solution. This is possible for finite element approximations where a representation of the approximate solution based on some basis functions is known (see [9]). In our finite difference setting, we instead use a better approximation of the operator as a reference.…”
Section: Error Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the efficient implementation of the FEM model introduced in Sec. 2, we use a method based on [12] and [26]. To this end we choose (tensor) Gauss-Lobatto nodes of degree p on rectangular elements for the definition of the nodal basis and for the numerical evaluation of the inner products in (2.16).…”
Section: Implementation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%