2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27813-9_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Toolset for Modelling and Verification of GALS Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,9,12,19]), we have not encountered any similar technique for asynchronous systems. Our technique shares many commonalities with its synchronous counterpart; an observer state observes the significant events and run-time states related to the properties.…”
Section: Property Specificationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[1,9,12,19]), we have not encountered any similar technique for asynchronous systems. Our technique shares many commonalities with its synchronous counterpart; an observer state observes the significant events and run-time states related to the properties.…”
Section: Property Specificationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We have described a simulator and model checker for our distributed reactive systems model in [14,15]. We have added an abstraction-refinement algorithm to the tool based on the ideas in this paper.…”
Section: Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…memory. Much research has recently been devoted to extending the synchronous languages to encompass a special class of distributed reactive systems called Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous (GALS) systems [6,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As regards related work, we can mention [29], which translates Crsm [28] into Promela and then uses the Spin model checker to verify properties expressed as a set of distributed observers; our approach is different in the sense that it can use synchronous languages just as they are, instead of introducing a new synchronous/asynchronous language such as Crsm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%