2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2011.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A topological characterization of the existence of non-empty choice sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An implicit 1 presence of that same point can be found in the more recent Bosi and Zuanon [8,Corollary 3.2] and Quartieri [22,Theorem 4], where the authors provide, respectively, characterizations of the existence of unconstrained maximals of a preorder and of the existence of maximals of an arbitrary relation on every nonempty compact subset of its ground set. Somehow relatedly, the same point is tacitly present also in Andrikopoulos and Zacharias [5], where Smith and Schwartz sets are considered with respect to fixed choice sets. None of the results mentioned so far provides purely topological conditions that characterize the existence of optimal points on every nonempty compact subset of the ground set of an objective relation (or, in the case of functions, of the domain of an objective function).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An implicit 1 presence of that same point can be found in the more recent Bosi and Zuanon [8,Corollary 3.2] and Quartieri [22,Theorem 4], where the authors provide, respectively, characterizations of the existence of unconstrained maximals of a preorder and of the existence of maximals of an arbitrary relation on every nonempty compact subset of its ground set. Somehow relatedly, the same point is tacitly present also in Andrikopoulos and Zacharias [5], where Smith and Schwartz sets are considered with respect to fixed choice sets. None of the results mentioned so far provides purely topological conditions that characterize the existence of optimal points on every nonempty compact subset of the ground set of an objective relation (or, in the case of functions, of the domain of an objective function).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…But the inequality S = Y and the equality in (4) entail that z / ∈ B ca (x) for some z ∈ Y : an entailment that-by virtue of Lemma 2.1-is in contradiction with (1) and (5). Therefore, S = Y and hence {S} is a finite subcover of γ .…”
Section: Characterizations For Total Preordersmentioning
confidence: 97%